Why do people think Cortez helped Floyd against Hatton?

Ring Leader

It was Hatton who was clinching excessively. Clinching and holding excessively is illegal in boxing, dont see why people are mad

Money Team.

why even address these haters??they hate on every floyd win and always will..........understand there will always be an excuse

Ring Leader

Quote:

Originally Posted by Larryx2011

why even address these haters??they hate on every floyd win and always will..........understand there will always be an excuse

true. But I was thinking about Hatton holding lots and remember it is illegal to do so. If anything, the ref helped Hatton since he didnt DQ his a$$

keehlnate

Who cares? Hatton is now a fat drugged b!tch and that match was ages ago. There is no point on arguing because nothing will change.

ИATAS

Cortez is notorious for not allowing inside fighting, khan vs maidana is one of many examples of that. Hatton is an inside fighter so they die hard hatton fans believe he didn't have a chance with cortez, hence the bitching.

Where they are wrong of course is believing hatton would have had a chance with any other ref. It wouldn't matter if the ref was steve smoger, kenny bayless or hulk holgan, he could never beat floyd.

Ring Leader

I just thought it was funny with the excessive holding and no one complained about Hatton doing illegal sh*t

deliveryman

Floyd out muscled and out fought Hatton on the inside, and then absolutely massacred him at range..

bojangles1987

Hatton was a fighter who's biggest strength was mauling his opponents, something Cortez refused to let happen.

Not saying he would have won otherwise, but Hatton's best strategy was not really allowed.

Freedom.

Ring Leader

Quote:

Originally Posted by bojangles1987

Hatton was a fighter who's biggest strength was mauling his opponents, something Cortez refused to let happen.

Not saying he would have won otherwise, but Hatton's best strategy was not really allowed.

Holding is illegal though.....

Ring Leader Undisputed Champion Join Date: Jul 2011 Posts: 2,315 Rep Power: 6 Points: 5,100,018,379.81 Bank: 11,120,064,943.38 Total Points: 16,220,083,323.19 Donate	Why do people think Cortez helped Floyd against Hatton? It was Hatton who was clinching excessively. Clinching and holding excessively is illegal in boxing, dont see why people are mad

Money Team. Banned Join Date: Jan 2011 Location: Getting Money Posts: 27,558 Rep Power: 188 Points: 570,000,352,110.49 Bank: 69,713,196,433,735.91 Total Points: 70,283,196,785,846.40 Donate	why even address these haters??they hate on every floyd win and always will..........understand there will always be an excuse

keehlnate Banned Join Date: Oct 2011 Posts: 211 Rep Power: 0 Points: 126,823.98 Bank: 0.00 Total Points: 126,823.98 Donate	Who cares? Hatton is now a fat drugged b!tch and that match was ages ago. There is no point on arguing because nothing will change.

deliveryman Your token white guy Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Toronto Age: 28 Posts: 7,576 Blog Entries: 1 Rep Power: 30 Points: 7,404.60 Bank: 1,895,794,460,343.65 Total Points: 1,895,794,467,748.25 Donate	Floyd out muscled and out fought Hatton on the inside, and then absolutely massacred him at range..

bojangles1987 bojangles1897 Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Hudson, Fl Posts: 21,784 Rep Power: 68 Points: 257,000,122,278.48 Bank: 10,894,984,482.97 Total Points: 267,895,106,761.45 Donate	Hatton was a fighter who's biggest strength was mauling his opponents, something Cortez refused to let happen. Not saying he would have won otherwise, but Hatton's best strategy was not really allowed.

Freedom. boxing aficionado Join Date: Dec 2007 Posts: 38,823 Rep Power: 201 Points: 76,919.01 Bank: 2,916,993,052,837.16 Total Points: 2,916,993,129,756.17 Donate