Quote:
Originally Posted by Walt Liquor
Your last paragraph is exactly what i said before with the reasoning why cuauht called yall out. Thx for agreeing.
|
If you're saying that Ether.'s motivation behind putting the question to him was to stir things up, we're in agreement. If you're saying 1502's considered answer was born out of anything but lingering butthurt from past exchanges, we'll just agree to differ.
Seriously, when do you ever see me or Jacky or waz mention this guy off the cuff when it's not apropos? This guy has a track record of that, even when
not being questioned about e-adversaries, usually when he's trying to emphasize and convince people of his "real guy" credentials in a thread that has nothing to do with Jacky/MIB/Stones!/wazaa and doesn't feature their contribution.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Walt Liquor
However, i dont get the feeling that you would be this disrespectful to cuauht face to face. Even though you trained with the duke of york.
|
Would he express his "views" the same way? I'm sure he'd assert that he would, but I doubt it. So I'd likely never even see the abhorrent nature of the person were I to ever cross paths with him in whatever capacity. If he were to reveal that to me in the same hostile manner he puts across here, I'd react with according contempt.
As for this,
"Or it could be the 22 messages I have from you little boys in my inbox that have threatened me with beheading, murder, infecting my computer with a virus, disgusting pics or the countless racist remarks...."
Only one of those is meant to be attributable to me, I believe. And, as that allegation isn't even true (ie. that I threatened to behead him, LMAO), I'd doubt the veracity of the rest.
Everyone who thinks he's a clueless prat and a blowhard is a "little boy". All of them.
