|08-09-2011, 05:35 AM||#11|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Columbus, Indiana
Quoted: 1953 Post(s)Rep Power: 231
Total Points: 59,898,643,186,548,105,216.00
his punches was certainly more technical and accurate.
his right hand was a thing of beauty. not that his left hook was anything to snicker at.
i doubt he was more powerful than the other guys you mentioned though.
foreman and shavers punches might not be technically correct but they had a lot more power behind it.
|08-09-2011, 08:29 AM||#15|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: BS mod-convention, Caracas.
Quoted: 1071 Post(s)Rep Power: 553
Total Points: 1,446,829,653,504,922,368.00
Louis (and Dempsey) was likely the greatest combination puncher in heavyweight history.
|08-09-2011, 09:10 AM||#17|
Join Date: Jul 2010
Quoted: 0 Post(s)Rep Power: 0
Total Points: 2,324,613.25
but the guys Joe Louis was knocking out were 170-190 lbs.
Ezzard Charles styled on that ass btw. 175er.
No one under 190 lbs would've clowned on Tyson, even in his decline.
|08-09-2011, 09:14 AM||#18|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Quoted: 4 Post(s)Rep Power: 45
Total Points: 7,569,015,955,941.98
|08-09-2011, 09:23 AM||#20|
King of Aesthetics
Join Date: May 2011
Quoted: 55 Post(s)Rep Power: 19
Total Points: 14,869,702,580,079,512.00
he just hit better, as in more accurate and threw better combinations
harder than foreman or shavers? no
|Share This With Friends|
|guys, harder, liston, louis, shavers, tyson|