Bookmark Website  | Free Registration  | The Team
Boxing Champions |  Boxing Schedule |  Boxing Video  |  Boxing History   |  Pound For Pound  | Lounge  | The Wire |  Audio  | Arcade

Navigation
Go Back   Boxing Forum > Boxing Forums > Training & Nutrition
Reply
Thread Navigation

#1
Old 07-31-2011, 12:13 PM
Boxjump
Amateur
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 0 Boxjump is on a distinguished road
Points: 1,439.75
Bank: 0.00
Total Points: 1,439.75
Default Making and Choosing Weight

Hi all,

So I am 6'1, 180 with hardly any fat and quite muscled.

I've been told by a few trainers that when I fight pro (haven't yet) they would want me at 160 because of my height, reach and power.

However, how on earth would I get down to 160 period!? And if I did there is no way i'd have the same power that I do at 180 right?

So, pro's and con's of fighting at 160 and at 175 and how could I even get to 160?

Thanks for advice in advance...
Reply With Quote
Boxjump is offline
Advertisements
>>>TO REMOVE THESE ADS, PLEASE REGISTER HERE FOR FREE<<<
#2
Old 08-02-2011, 12:51 AM
Boxjump
Amateur
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 0 Boxjump is on a distinguished road
Points: 1,439.75
Bank: 0.00
Total Points: 1,439.75
Default

Ok so here's another question...

What factors determine whether a boxer should fight at 175 or 160?
Reply With Quote
Boxjump is offline
#3
Old 08-02-2011, 04:12 AM
Clegg
...
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: London
Posts: 24,811
Rep Power: 155 Clegg has a reputation beyond repute Clegg has a reputation beyond repute Clegg has a reputation beyond repute Clegg has a reputation beyond repute Clegg has a reputation beyond repute Clegg has a reputation beyond repute Clegg has a reputation beyond repute Clegg has a reputation beyond repute Clegg has a reputation beyond repute Clegg has a reputation beyond repute Clegg has a reputation beyond repute
Points: 1,067,088,970,329,353.25
Bank: 25,370,322,647,158,072.00
Total Points: 26,437,411,617,487,420.00
Before I get banned. - Richard Nixon  FREE RiZO! - Carlton Banks  MMM-My Sharona! - RiZО  Have an apple Clegg - danc1984  Yank food is good - mangler jr 
Chunk cake - It's part of your 5 a day! - Chunk  Coffee Is Professional - Loccy  To make up for that soggy one. - Raider Monkz  mhh Alizee is moi lolita &amp;lt;3 - cleaner147  Professional Cookie - Loccy 
super clegg - Old Coward  No Message - -veteran420-  with love - -veteran420-  Merry Christmas - Flab  Happy new year! - Toney Loc 
yum yum pot noodle - Mike_Hunt  super e-baller - MANIAC310  Well deserved, never saw you at history section - HaglerSteelChin  It sounds like you need one, LOL - HaglerSteelChin  Have some more - HaglerSteelChin 
Graves Disease - Lymphedema - Men's Health - Pro Choice - Prostate Cancer - Scleroderma - Thyroid Disease - Trisomy 18 - mangler  Gay and Lesbian Pride - The Scientist  Gay and Lesbian Pride - RiΖΟ  Graves Disease - Lymphedema - Men's Health - Pro Choice - Prostate Cancer - Scleroderma - Thyroid Disease - Trisomy 18 - PensionKiller  Mourning - Anti-Gang - Melanoma - Loccy 
Mourning - Anti-Gang - Melanoma - Loccy  Mourning - Anti-Gang - Melanoma - Loccy  Mourning - Anti-Gang - Melanoma - Loccy  Adoptee - Bone Cancer - Child Exploitation and Abuse - Hope and Support - Peace - Retinoblastoma - Right to Life - Student Sexual Assault - Loccy  Mourning - Anti-Gang - Melanoma - Loccy 
Adoptee - Bone Cancer - Child Exploitation and Abuse - Hope and Support - Peace - Retinoblastoma - Right to Life - Student Sexual Assault - Loccy  Mourning - Anti-Gang - Melanoma - Loccy  Adoptee - Bone Cancer - Child Exploitation and Abuse - Hope and Support - Peace - Retinoblastoma - Right to Life - Student Sexual Assault - Loccy  Mourning - Anti-Gang - Melanoma - Loccy  Adoptee - Bone Cancer - Child Exploitation and Abuse - Hope and Support - Peace - Retinoblastoma - Right to Life - Student Sexual Assault - Loccy 
Childhood Cancer - MANGLER  Bone Marrow Donation - Childhood Depression - Depression - Environment - Eye Injury Prevention - Glaucoma - Kidney Cancer - Kidney Disease - Kidney Transplantation - Leukemia - Lyme Disease - Mental Retardation - Missing Children - Organ Donation - T - MANGLER  Gay and Lesbian Pride - jazluvr  Gay and Lesbian Pride - jazluvr  Head and Neck Cancer - LeeVanCleef 
Default

I'm not sure what you training is like, but I think almost anyone can drain themselves a bit to make weight and then put it back on before the fight, so 175 should be easy enough for you.

IDK about 160, 6'1 is tall for a MW, Pavlik, Taylor and Hopkins are that height but only made it with world-class professionals working with them plus a full training camp, which 99% of boxers don't have. Maybe you could make it, hard to say without knowing your diet (because if it's bad then maybe you could improve it to help with weight loss) and fat %.

Did you ask your coaches?
Reply With Quote
Clegg is offline
#4
Old 08-02-2011, 05:19 AM
ChowAce
Contender
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Den Haag, the Netherlands
Age: 26
Posts: 130
Rep Power: 6 ChowAce is on a distinguished road
Points: 12,694.11
Bank: 0.00
Total Points: 12,694.11
Default

Yea I would say 175 is probably your best bet. Just follow a strict diet and see what happens with your weight. Your body will tell you whether or not cutting more weight is a good thing.
Reply With Quote
ChowAce is offline
#5
Old 08-02-2011, 12:49 PM
paulsinghnl
Student of the game
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 839
Rep Power: 8 paulsinghnl has a reputation beyond repute paulsinghnl has a reputation beyond repute paulsinghnl has a reputation beyond repute paulsinghnl has a reputation beyond repute paulsinghnl has a reputation beyond repute paulsinghnl has a reputation beyond repute paulsinghnl has a reputation beyond repute paulsinghnl has a reputation beyond repute paulsinghnl has a reputation beyond repute paulsinghnl has a reputation beyond repute paulsinghnl has a reputation beyond repute
Points: 47,958.17
Bank: 202,862.66
Total Points: 250,820.83
Default

i think i'd read up a lot on cutting weight and all that. but the most important thing TO ME is that with cutting weight, you also drain a lot of fluids from around your head and brain, which can cause more serious brain injuries.

so my advice: the closer to natural weight, the better, screw what the rest have to say.
Reply With Quote
paulsinghnl is offline
#6
Old 08-02-2011, 01:04 PM
esex
Up and Comer
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 70
Rep Power: 4 esex has a reputation beyond repute esex has a reputation beyond repute esex has a reputation beyond repute esex has a reputation beyond repute esex has a reputation beyond repute esex has a reputation beyond repute esex has a reputation beyond repute esex has a reputation beyond repute esex has a reputation beyond repute esex has a reputation beyond repute esex has a reputation beyond repute
Points: 633.97
Bank: 143,898.92
Total Points: 144,532.89
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Boxjump View Post
Hi all,

So I am 6'1, 180 with hardly any fat and quite muscled.

I've been told by a few trainers that when I fight pro (haven't yet) they would want me at 160 because of my height, reach and power.

However, how on earth would I get down to 160 period!? And if I did there is no way i'd have the same power that I do at 180 right?

So, pro's and con's of fighting at 160 and at 175 and how could I even get to 160?

Thanks for advice in advance...
160 sounds hazardous to your health , but 168 might be attainable via measured dieting and dehydration come weigh-in .
175 will be hazardous for your health due to the big men you're gonna fight , and you won't be as dangerous for them.
Therefore , I'd recommend you 168.
Reply With Quote
esex is offline
#7
Old 08-02-2011, 01:11 PM
Clegg
...
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: London
Posts: 24,811
Rep Power: 155 Clegg has a reputation beyond repute Clegg has a reputation beyond repute Clegg has a reputation beyond repute Clegg has a reputation beyond repute Clegg has a reputation beyond repute Clegg has a reputation beyond repute Clegg has a reputation beyond repute Clegg has a reputation beyond repute Clegg has a reputation beyond repute Clegg has a reputation beyond repute Clegg has a reputation beyond repute
Points: 1,067,088,970,329,353.25
Bank: 25,370,322,647,158,072.00
Total Points: 26,437,411,617,487,420.00
Before I get banned. - Richard Nixon  FREE RiZO! - Carlton Banks  MMM-My Sharona! - RiZО  Have an apple Clegg - danc1984  Yank food is good - mangler jr 
Chunk cake - It's part of your 5 a day! - Chunk  Coffee Is Professional - Loccy  To make up for that soggy one. - Raider Monkz  mhh Alizee is moi lolita &amp;lt;3 - cleaner147  Professional Cookie - Loccy 
super clegg - Old Coward  No Message - -veteran420-  with love - -veteran420-  Merry Christmas - Flab  Happy new year! - Toney Loc 
yum yum pot noodle - Mike_Hunt  super e-baller - MANIAC310  Well deserved, never saw you at history section - HaglerSteelChin  It sounds like you need one, LOL - HaglerSteelChin  Have some more - HaglerSteelChin 
Graves Disease - Lymphedema - Men's Health - Pro Choice - Prostate Cancer - Scleroderma - Thyroid Disease - Trisomy 18 - mangler  Gay and Lesbian Pride - The Scientist  Gay and Lesbian Pride - RiΖΟ  Graves Disease - Lymphedema - Men's Health - Pro Choice - Prostate Cancer - Scleroderma - Thyroid Disease - Trisomy 18 - PensionKiller  Mourning - Anti-Gang - Melanoma - Loccy 
Mourning - Anti-Gang - Melanoma - Loccy  Mourning - Anti-Gang - Melanoma - Loccy  Mourning - Anti-Gang - Melanoma - Loccy  Adoptee - Bone Cancer - Child Exploitation and Abuse - Hope and Support - Peace - Retinoblastoma - Right to Life - Student Sexual Assault - Loccy  Mourning - Anti-Gang - Melanoma - Loccy 
Adoptee - Bone Cancer - Child Exploitation and Abuse - Hope and Support - Peace - Retinoblastoma - Right to Life - Student Sexual Assault - Loccy  Mourning - Anti-Gang - Melanoma - Loccy  Adoptee - Bone Cancer - Child Exploitation and Abuse - Hope and Support - Peace - Retinoblastoma - Right to Life - Student Sexual Assault - Loccy  Mourning - Anti-Gang - Melanoma - Loccy  Adoptee - Bone Cancer - Child Exploitation and Abuse - Hope and Support - Peace - Retinoblastoma - Right to Life - Student Sexual Assault - Loccy 
Childhood Cancer - MANGLER  Bone Marrow Donation - Childhood Depression - Depression - Environment - Eye Injury Prevention - Glaucoma - Kidney Cancer - Kidney Disease - Kidney Transplantation - Leukemia - Lyme Disease - Mental Retardation - Missing Children - Organ Donation - T - MANGLER  Gay and Lesbian Pride - jazluvr  Gay and Lesbian Pride - jazluvr  Head and Neck Cancer - LeeVanCleef 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by paulsinghnl View Post
i think i'd read up a lot on cutting weight and all that. but the most important thing TO ME is that with cutting weight, you also drain a lot of fluids from around your head and brain, which can cause more serious brain injuries.

so my advice: the closer to natural weight, the better, screw what the rest have to say.
Yeah, I think cutting down weight to be as big as possible in your division is a dangerous approach. It can work but it can also go wrong.

Mayweather and Pacquiao have been smaller than most of their opponents on the past few years and they're seen as the best in the sport. Martinez hasn't been bigger than anyone he's fought in his most impressive wins. Carl Froch claims that he is at fighting weight weeks before he steps into the ring, and he's known for his durability and stamina.

Obviously size has helped boxers on lots of occassions, but it sometimes it's a bad idea to do things that way.

Another thing for the OP to consider is whether or not being the taller man suits his style. If he likes to fight on the inside and isn't skilled at keeping people on the end of his jab, then he may do better against people his own size/slightly bigger rather than against shorter opposition.
Reply With Quote
Clegg is offline
#8
Old 08-02-2011, 04:27 PM
paulsinghnl
Student of the game
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 839
Rep Power: 8 paulsinghnl has a reputation beyond repute paulsinghnl has a reputation beyond repute paulsinghnl has a reputation beyond repute paulsinghnl has a reputation beyond repute paulsinghnl has a reputation beyond repute paulsinghnl has a reputation beyond repute paulsinghnl has a reputation beyond repute paulsinghnl has a reputation beyond repute paulsinghnl has a reputation beyond repute paulsinghnl has a reputation beyond repute paulsinghnl has a reputation beyond repute
Points: 47,958.17
Bank: 202,862.66
Total Points: 250,820.83
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by esex View Post
160 sounds hazardous to your health , but 168 might be attainable via measured dieting and dehydration come weigh-in .
175 will be hazardous for your health due to the big men you're gonna fight , and you won't be as dangerous for them.
Therefore , I'd recommend you 168.
if the opponents are stronger, you can adapt your style to that.
Reply With Quote
paulsinghnl is offline
#9
Old 08-02-2011, 04:28 PM
paulsinghnl
Student of the game
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 839
Rep Power: 8 paulsinghnl has a reputation beyond repute paulsinghnl has a reputation beyond repute paulsinghnl has a reputation beyond repute paulsinghnl has a reputation beyond repute paulsinghnl has a reputation beyond repute paulsinghnl has a reputation beyond repute paulsinghnl has a reputation beyond repute paulsinghnl has a reputation beyond repute paulsinghnl has a reputation beyond repute paulsinghnl has a reputation beyond repute paulsinghnl has a reputation beyond repute
Points: 47,958.17
Bank: 202,862.66
Total Points: 250,820.83
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clegg View Post
Yeah, I think cutting down weight to be as big as possible in your division is a dangerous approach. It can work but it can also go wrong.

Mayweather and Pacquiao have been smaller than most of their opponents on the past few years and they're seen as the best in the sport. Martinez hasn't been bigger than anyone he's fought in his most impressive wins. Carl Froch claims that he is at fighting weight weeks before he steps into the ring, and he's known for his durability and stamina.

Obviously size has helped boxers on lots of occassions, but it sometimes it's a bad idea to do things that way.

Another thing for the OP to consider is whether or not being the taller man suits his style. If he likes to fight on the inside and isn't skilled at keeping people on the end of his jab, then he may do better against people his own size/slightly bigger rather than against shorter opposition.
yup true, you're gonna have to adapt to the weight class, work on your style etc.
Reply With Quote
paulsinghnl is offline
#10
Old 08-02-2011, 06:12 PM
ghns1133
#1 p4p ATG/GOAT
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 3,459
Rep Power: 11 ghns1133 has a reputation beyond repute ghns1133 has a reputation beyond repute ghns1133 has a reputation beyond repute ghns1133 has a reputation beyond repute ghns1133 has a reputation beyond repute ghns1133 has a reputation beyond repute ghns1133 has a reputation beyond repute ghns1133 has a reputation beyond repute ghns1133 has a reputation beyond repute ghns1133 has a reputation beyond repute ghns1133 has a reputation beyond repute
Points: 1,050,390,687.24
Bank: 3,679,913,011.64
Total Points: 4,730,303,698.88
Some Green! - Barnburner  on me - danny711  and a shot - danny711  actually theres beer inside - kyshenko team  imagine it's Floyd when you stick it in - Freedom. 
heres your gift have fun - sugersean15  Boss lady aint shiit! - Uncle Howie  for teh vids - ƒallenloki 
Default

if u r 180 as a pro, with the weigh in the day before....

u could probably make 168 easy and on fight night hydrate back up to 180...

cant tell u what u should make but i dont think 160 is a completly out there.
Reply With Quote
ghns1133 is offline
Reply

Share This With Friends

Tags
choosing , making , weight

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Privacy Policy - Submit News - Feedback - Site Map - Advertise with Us

Copyright © 2003-2014 BoxingScene LLC All rights reserved.

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:54 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.