Quote:
Originally Posted by savorduhflavor
Cotto did the most damage to Paulie, but that was the most competitive fight.
I honestly think Hatton beat Paulie up better than the other two.
I thought the stoppage in the Hatton fight was better than the stoppage in the Khan fight to be honsest.
|
I'll tell you why I disagree.
The official's stoppage vs. Khan felt merciful, ie. Paul was going downhill in there fast, he was unable to spoil much and it was starting to get unpleasant to watch.
McGirt's stoppage felt like a principle stoppage. He's not a trainer who would be especially tolerant of his fighter having almost zero offense. It didn't feel merciful, because Paul was spoiling to limit the damage and it felt like he could have gone the full 12 without any grave danger.
Notice how Paulie kicked up a huge fuss about being stopped vs. Hatton. A little resistance out of stubborn pride vs. Khan, but much less so.
I assume the threadstarter's question to mean who gave Paulie the worst physical beating rather than who won most comprehensively, though.
If we're arguing the latter question, then I say Khan. Malignaggi was effective in spoiling and limiting the damage Hatton could put on him, but the Khan fight was becoming sickening by the finish, Paul's head was snapping back from the jab constantly. That was a *real* clinic and a mercy stoppage from a pretty hardened official IIRC.