Dan Rafael latest P4P (as of Apr 19, 2011): "Sergio OVERTAKES Floyd @ Number 2"

[Fix]

rafael the same guy who scored berto winning against ortiz.. his opinion is redundant.. i can see the logic behind the p4p list.. mayweather been inactive a long time.. but overall dan rafaels opinion is worthless. its almost an insult to boxing to have the guys name in the forum.

[Akucapri]

They'll keep him there, to hype up the SUPER FIGHT.

[TintaBoricua]

Originally Posted by Freedom!

Mayweather has fought only twice in the past 3 1/2 years, against an opponent from a smaller weight division and against an old age 38 opponent.

He did not win either fight impressively. He failed to stop either both older opponents.

Floyd should not be in the top 3 P4P at all! In fact after a year of inactivity he should be removed from the top 10.

What does that have to do with his ranking? If he were a power puncher, sure. I'd understand. Floyd isn't known as a guy who stops fighters. He DID win impressively, he thoroughly outpointed his opponents.

The huge glaring problem is that he's highly inactive, but whenever he fights, he shines.

I agree that he should be removed from the top 10 if he doesn't fight by May 1st, which will mark a year of inactivity.

[Cash Cow]

Originally Posted by SuckaPunch

Fat Dan's latest P4P List (as of Apr 19, 2011)



1 Pac
2 Sergio
3 Floyd

http://sports.espn.go.com/sports/box...dan&id=6393437

Didnt this clown have Berto beating Ortiz?

[Zarco]

Originally Posted by withoutthee666

That happened after Sergio beat Dzinziruk.

OMG if that uppercut in your sig would have landed

[oc9979]

Originally Posted by Freedom!

Mayweather has fought only twice in the past 3 1/2 years, against an opponent from a smaller weight division and against an old age 38 opponent.

He did not win either fight impressively. He failed to stop either both older opponents.
Floyd should not be in the top 3 P4P at all! In fact after a year of inactivity he should be removed from the top 10.

WoW!! We could tell you are a hater. Losing 1 round in both fight is not impressive enough?

[oc9979]

Originally Posted by October

1) Martinez moved up in weight to beat Pavlik.

2) Martinez knocked out Paul Williams, a P4P fighter and top welterweight at the time.

3) Martinez knocked out an undefeated Sergei Dzinziruk, who currently has one of the best jabs in boxing (Martinez outjabbing Dzinziruk, by the way, doesn't diminish Dzinziruk's jab. Having a great jab has nothing to do with avoiding the other fighter's jab, remember.)

4) Floyd fought JMM out of JMM's weight class and was over the weight requirement himself.

5) Floyd beat Shane Mosley (who has trouble with pure boxers) by decision.

Seems like a good argument to give Sergio the second spot.

I agree with Sergio being 2nd but Mosley beat Margarito in his previous fight. It is not Floyd's fault that Mosley has trouble with pure boxer. Paul Willams was a good win but in my opinion he lost to Cintron.