prime Corrie Sanders vs. the current version of Wladimir Klitschko

[2Fast]

Why didn't wlad rematch them if he knew he could beat them? Why did he let his brother do the dirty work?

[Pirao]

Wlad easily. Now, what about Haye vs Corrie Sanders? I think Haye gets KTFO in the 1st.

[Jim Jeffries]

Originally Posted by 2Fast

Tyson fought 30 fights in his firs 2 years and against champions

Fair enough. Tyson also never went 7 active years undefeated the way Wlad has. You can't call Mike's prime 3 or 4 years and in the same breath use more than 12 year old fights to discredit Wlad with.

[cklmaced]

Originally Posted by Pirao

Wlad easily. Now, what about Haye vs Corrie Sanders? I think Haye gets KTFO in the 1st.

Back to Haye as always even though topic has nothing to do with him. Wlad as a weak chin and if he didn't clinch so much maybe he would have avoided that "headbutt" that cost him the fight. If Wlad is one of the hardest hitting HWs of all time how come he couldn't KO Purrity if he was beating him for 10 rounds.

[2Fast]

Originally Posted by Jim Jeffries

Fair enough. Tyson also never went 7 active years undefeated the way Wlad has. You can't call Mike's prime 3 or 4 years and in the same breath use more than 12 year old fights to discredit Wlad with.

That was in response to that clown who was trying to find an excus for Wlads loss.

Not to compare wlads legacy with tysons legacy

[Jim Jeffries]

Originally Posted by 2Fast

That was in response to that clown who was trying to find an excus for Wlads loss.

Not to compare wlads legacy with tysons legacy

Well to be fair, there aren't nearly as many excuses for Wlad's losses as there are for Tyson's. Difference being Tyson gets this 3 year window where he could theoretically beat "anyone," while this version of Wlad, who's developed a (admittedly somewhat boring) style that's allowed him to go almost 7 years undefeated on a world level, hypothetically loses to anyone with half a punch (and even some that don't.)

[2Fast]

Originally Posted by Jim Jeffries

Well to be fair, there aren't nearly as many excuses for Wlad's losses as there are for Tyson's. Difference being Tyson gets this 3 year window where he could theoretically beat "anyone," while this version of Wlad, who's developed a (admittedly somewhat boring) style that's allowed him to go almost 7 years undefeated on a world level, hypothetically loses to anyone with half a punch (and even some that don't.)

That I agree with. Even though Wlad being poisoned against brewster is the most ridiculous one i have ever heared. But let's stick to the thread subject.

[Jim Jeffries]

Originally Posted by 2Fast

That I agree with. Even though Wlad being poisoned against brewster is the most ridiculous one i have ever heared. But let's stick to the thread subject.

My only problem with the Brewster fight was that Wlad was hit (just) after the bell by a hard left hook, beats the count and gets stopped between rounds. I would've liked to see the ref give him the minute to see if he could recover.

[2Fast]

Originally Posted by Jim Jeffries

My only problem with the Brewster fight was that Wlad was hit (just) after the bell by a hard left hook, beats the count and gets stopped between rounds. I would've liked to see the ref give him the minute to see if he could recover.

yeah I found that strange to but Wlad and his corner didn't complain

[2Fast]

bump........