|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
| Boxing Champions | Boxing Schedule | Boxing Video | Boxing History | Pound For Pound | Lounge | The Wire | Audio | Arcade |
|
rugged individualist
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Ameritopia, U.S.S.A.
Posts: 21,401
Rep Power: 83
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I've always wondered why unions are allowed to exist in government. Either gov jobs are crucial, or they're not. If they're crucial, then how can we allow unions to shut down their services? If they're not, then why don't we get rid of them? Looks like Franklin Delano Roosevelt, the US's 32nd president, agrees with me.
"The process of collective bargaining, as usually understood, cannot be transplanted into the public service," Roosevelt wrote in 1937 to the National Federation of Federal Employees. Yes, public workers may demand fair treatment, wrote Roosevelt. But, he wrote, "I want to emphasize my conviction that militant tactics have no place" in the public sector. "A strike of public employees manifests nothing less than an intent on their part to prevent or obstruct the operations of Government." http://www.realclearpolitics.com/art...or_108962.html |
|
|
||
|
Truly Grateful!!!!!!
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Converse, Texas
Age: 36
Posts: 14,429
Rep Power: 370
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Points: 1,456,201,831,574.32
Bank: 3,012,939,669,706,084.00
Total Points: 3,014,395,871,537,658.00
|
Quote:
FDR's take is very interesting Jim. Thanks for droppin this jewel of knowledge. ![]() |
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| government, unions. |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
|
|
Fight Videos - Privacy Policy - Submit
News - Feedback
- Site Map - Advertise
with Us
Copyright © 2003-2013 BoxingScene LLC All rights reserved.
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.