Hey, Kevin Cunningham, exactly which Black fighter should Manny have fought?

[Money Team.]

Originally Posted by generivera100

Nate Campbell and Zahir Raheem ???

You've got to be kidding . IS THAT ALL YOU CAN COME UP WITH ????

campbell was the linear champ..and raheem beat morales.....so why not fight them??

[ColdCa$hCanelo]

Originally Posted by generivera100

Problem is there are no slick black fighters at the top of every division Pac's been fighting at.

Even at WW, Cotto is at the top, Berto is but is not worthy (yet), and we all know what happened to Floyd.

At JWW, Ricky Hatton was the lineal and undefeated titleholder when Pac unseated him.

And all the weight classes below , no slick black fighters.

Pac only fights the best out there, not his fault there were no slick black fighters in his way.

But if you explain this to some blacks, they just don't get it.

We have a winner folks. The one slick Black guy that was out there,

went on vacation.

[ColdCa$hCanelo]

Originally Posted by bob marley

campbell was the linear champ..and raheem beat morales.....so why not fight them??

"Boxing is a business", remember?

So why waste time beating guys who are fighting on ESPN?

[UglyPug]

haha my man just OWNED the "black superiority/slickness" bull**** that hopkins spews out his ballwasher along with cunningham now. lol these were the guys that probably thought, and maybe still think malignaggi could beat pac HAHAHA.

[-MAKAVELLI-]

someone should show Kevin Cunningham a tape of Kotelnik-Alexander to remind him what a southpaw with just 'decent' handspeed did to Devon...

[KILLA RIGHT]

This Fuken thread again?

[Bastian Loc]

Originally Posted by Johnny Chingas

You mean the Nate Campbell that got knocked out by Robbie Peden? Or the Nate Campbell who got a SD over Diaz and a MD with Funeka?

That Nate Campbell?



Zahir Raheem? You mean the guy who lost his very next fight after beating Morales in his first fight at 135, Raheem?

That Zahir Raheem?

Surely you can come up with somebody better than those two guys.

Yup, those are the two guys.

I can easily bring up Pacquiao's past losses too and claim that disqualifies him from every getting a fight again, but then I'd be as stupid and biased as you.

[Bastian Loc]

Originally Posted by bob marley

campbell was the linear champ..and raheem beat morales.....so why not fight them??

I like how people just like to pretend that those guys didn't earn it.

People like to pretend Raheem/Morales literally never happened.

[ModernTalking]

Originally Posted by Subtraction

He should've fought Nate Campbell after he beat Diaz instead of cherrypicking that bum david Diaz.

He could've fought Raheem after he embarrassed Morales.

LOL so he shouldn't have pick the bum Diaz when he beats Diaz...LOL

Anyway are you saying that Campbell was more dangerous than fighting Dela Hoya ....LOL

[JonoYoungP4P]

kev cunningham talks too much trash