I can't pick a camp thats easier to discredit. I back Pac up on the factt that he is active. I criticise him on his fights after Cotto being weak opponents and scraps from Mayweather.
I back up Floyd because he had such a long period where he WAS storming the divisions and WAS fighting att the peak and WAS UNDENIABLY the P4P number one. I criticise him because since Hatton he has had weak ass fights and recently his attacks on Pacquiao seem like b1tching, but still he has retained his zero against the world's finest for a good period and that deserves credit.
You can't be a world champ for 12 years straight and be a fraud whatever anyone says.
One more thing, Mayweather's camp obviously respects pacquiao's ability but raises questions on the sterois abuse to cloud the issue.
This is as bad as Arum picking Margarito and then Mosley for Pac.
Last edited by DET. IRONSIDE; 12-17-2010 at 03:05 AM.
|