|10-01-2010, 12:43 AM||#1|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Quoted: 0 Post(s)Rep Power: 14
Total Points: 151,603.71
Fight Science Biased against boxing?
Why did they use Steve Petramale to represent boxing? He is less than a bum, he had only 4 fights as a LIGHT MIDDLEWEIGHT and did not KO one of these fighters. None of them had ever won a fight or fought more than 2 times...He drawed in his 4th fight against a guy who was 0-2-0...Steve is a giant vag and many of the guys that post on this board would beat him to death...
WHY WHY WHY Don't they ever get a hard hitter? Why never a David Tua, Sam Peter, Mike Tyson, or especially old George...Even go down to middleweight and get Jeff Lacy, he hit hard even for a heavyweight! The MMA fighters they get to hit the bag hit the TOP of the bag, which makes it swing more and has less sand in that area. They had James Toney hit the bag, James Toney IS a LIGHT puncher, and IS a blown up extremely talented ATG middleweight that cannot punch for ****ing **** compared to heavy handed Heavyweights, that is just rock solid fact...Toney still got 1300 win points WITH boxing gloves on(Which absorb more impact than MMA gloves) and using perfect boxing technique hitting the CENTER of the bag, NO haymakers....Rampage used MMA gloves and he hit the TOP of the bag with a un practical haymaker, he got 1600lbs...I bet Toney hits harder....Also 1600lbs was more than ANY kick they ever measured if I am not mistaken...
They also always fail to take into account the size and skill level of the contestants, obviously Steve was a stupid ****ing bum trainer that weighed about 160lbs...
The point is why doesn't ANYONE ever measure the punches of boxings best hitters? The show proves that the hardest hits are harder than their hardest kicks, but they never got ****ing MIRKO CRO COP, the guy said to have the hardest kicks in recorded history, to work on the ****ing show! Ignorant retards...
|Share This With Friends|
|biased, boxing?, fight, science|