dawson-pascal proved something

[Mitch5]

Here we go with this..pascal-dawson doesn't eual pac-may..it just doesn't...floyd does many things dawson doesn't do, and pac does many things pascal doesn't do...dawson didn't have the will to win that night, he didn't use the jab, and didnt counter often he just covered up when pascal threw..actually dawson looked more like clottey with that performance he had saturday

[GoogleMe]

Mayweather is WAY better then Chad Dawson.

[led*]

Originally Posted by V-3

Where do you guys come up with this stuff? Chad and Jean have zero to do with Floyd and Manny.

yes they have nothing to do with it. except chad proved alot wrong.

here's a quote from a certain poster here, i wont name him. and he is a floyd fan where he also wrote this in a way comparing floyd and pac.

"Chad Dawson will rule the sport as number 1 P4P in 2 years. You won't doubt him again after this bout. He will show you that he is in a class above Jean Pascal(who I would be rooting for if he wasn't against Chad) and anyone else near his weight."

[led*]

Originally Posted by GoogleMe

Mayweather is WAY better then Chad Dawson.

pacquiao is way better than jean pascal

[led*]

Originally Posted by Mitch5

Here we go with this..pascal-dawson doesn't eual pac-may..it just doesn't...floyd does many things dawson doesn't do, and pac does many things pascal doesn't do...dawson didn't have the will to win that night, he didn't use the jab, and didnt counter often he just covered up when pascal threw..actually dawson looked more like clottey with that performance he had saturday

in bold letter. is that an excuse?

[Mitch5]

Originally Posted by led

in bold letter. is that an excuse?

no excuse for how dawson looked...to me he just didnt look like he had that will to win saturday.

[led*]

Originally Posted by Cuauhtémoc1502

Pascal doesn't = Pacman and Dawson doesn't = Mayweather.

It's a stretch to say the least.

yes, floyd and pac are better than those two. but an upset is always there.

[led*]

Originally Posted by Mitch5

no excuse for how dawson looked...to me he just didnt look like he had that will to win saturday.

pascal's game have made dawson looked that way.

[Spray_resistant]

<<<<< subscribes to this thread for later bumpage after the rematch

seriously TS, you are jumping to some crazy conclusions about Dawson after just 1 bad performance.

[led*]

Originally Posted by JDezi4

Isn't this like the third time someone made a thread like this? How do u even compare Mayweather to Dawson? Their styles r completely different. One's a conventional boxer, one's an unorthodox counterpuncher. The one thing that mess Dawson up is when Pascal went in to run his flurry, Dawson covers up. If he'd have countered (which he did in the 11th and stopped Pascal in his tracks) it would have been a completely different fight. And the fact u people r even comparing Pascal to Pacquiao is in itself an insult to Pacquiao. That just retarded

idk if its 3rd time. since you said if. what if dawson went in to counter the flurry what do you think would happen? lots of if.

one thing is sure, athleticism beats skills that night.