Bookmark Website  | Free Registration  | The Team
Boxing Champions |  Boxing Schedule |  Boxing Video  |  Boxing History   |  Pound For Pound  | Lounge  | The Wire |  Audio  | Arcade

Navigation
Go Back   Boxing Forum > Boxing Forums > Boxing History
Reply
Thread Navigation

#11
Old 08-12-2011, 01:15 PM
jabsRstiff
! ! ! !
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 9,504
Rep Power: 4032 jabsRstiff has a reputation beyond reputejabsRstiff has a reputation beyond reputejabsRstiff has a reputation beyond reputejabsRstiff has a reputation beyond reputejabsRstiff has a reputation beyond reputejabsRstiff has a reputation beyond reputejabsRstiff has a reputation beyond reputejabsRstiff has a reputation beyond reputejabsRstiff has a reputation beyond reputejabsRstiff has a reputation beyond reputejabsRstiff has a reputation beyond repute
Points: 9,359.92
Bank: 123,155,625,418.64
Total Points: 123,155,634,778.56
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clegg View Post
I would guess that he was better than Mickey Rourke.

No one should make a comeback in their 50s. Despite what Foreman and Hopkins have done, very very few should be fighting in their 40s.
Danza was a boxer who was discovered, and became an actor. I believe it was the othe way around for Rourke.

Danza was a real fighter, Rourke was a novelty.
Reply With Quote
jabsRstiff is offline
Advertisements
>>>TO REMOVE THESE ADS, PLEASE REGISTER HERE FOR FREE<<<
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


Privacy Policy - Submit News - Feedback - Site Map - Advertise with Us

Copyright 2003-2013 BoxingScene LLC All rights reserved.

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:38 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.