|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
| Boxing Champions | Boxing Schedule | Boxing Video | Boxing History | Pound For Pound | Lounge | The Wire | Audio | Arcade |
|
|
||
|
Contender
Join Date: Nov 2009
Age: 26
Posts: 287
Rep Power: 4
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Pac always says he is respectful of the sport of boxing.. but he's not... and maybe he is, aware that he is hurting the sport of boxing by demanding fighting at catchweights for division belts. He's not bright at making decisions.
Fighting for the 154 division for title belt at catchweight of 150, with the wrong choice of opponent doesn't bode well for him. History will not forget this. Last edited by titan_1987; 07-29-2010 at 01:05 PM. |
|
Contender
Join Date: Nov 2009
Age: 26
Posts: 287
Rep Power: 4
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
Undisputed Champion
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 3,613
Rep Power: 11
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Also, catch-weights for titles isn't new. Its rare, but not unprecedented in the sport. Its only in this time that people are making such a huge fuss over it. I'm not sure even if historically this will hurt Pac. We'll see. |
|
|
Undisputed Champion
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 9,455
Rep Power: 29
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
It's not a precedent because catchweight fights, even in title bouts, are nothing new.
Not that I like it though. Titles in boxing have already lost value with the number of belts out there, and more divisions. It means even less when a fighter isn't contractually allowed to weigh in at the weight limit for the division. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| catchweight, decade, king |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Privacy Policy - Submit
News - Feedback
- Site Map - Advertise
with Us
Copyright © 2003-2013 BoxingScene LLC All rights reserved.