OK we all know that shane was old and inactive - Page 7 - Boxing Forum
Boxing Forum
Navigation
Go Back   Boxing Forum > Boxing Forums > Non Stop Boxing

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-08-2010, 06:12 AM #61
Prime 407 Prime 407 is offline
The Best Around
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,296
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Rep Power: 15
Prime 407 has a reputation beyond reputePrime 407 has a reputation beyond reputePrime 407 has a reputation beyond reputePrime 407 has a reputation beyond reputePrime 407 has a reputation beyond reputePrime 407 has a reputation beyond reputePrime 407 has a reputation beyond reputePrime 407 has a reputation beyond reputePrime 407 has a reputation beyond reputePrime 407 has a reputation beyond reputePrime 407 has a reputation beyond repute
Points: 10,000,043,122.83
Bank: 19,307,290,580,003.99
Total Points: 19,317,290,623,126.82
well deserved - HaglerSteelChin you're a complete joke - ROSS CALIFORNIA 
Default

Yeah not really that good a win, here's an equation for you:

Mosley + old - peds = below average win
Prime 407 is offline   Reply With Quote
Advertisements
>>>TO REMOVE THESE ADS, PLEASE REGISTER HERE FOR FREE<<<
Old 05-08-2010, 10:49 PM #62
STRUGG STRUGG is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 7,481
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Rep Power: 0
STRUGG has a reputation beyond reputeSTRUGG has a reputation beyond reputeSTRUGG has a reputation beyond reputeSTRUGG has a reputation beyond reputeSTRUGG has a reputation beyond reputeSTRUGG has a reputation beyond reputeSTRUGG has a reputation beyond reputeSTRUGG has a reputation beyond reputeSTRUGG has a reputation beyond reputeSTRUGG has a reputation beyond reputeSTRUGG has a reputation beyond repute
Points: 300,023.18
Bank: 2,679,841,400.23
Total Points: 2,680,141,423.41
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by - JCHING - View Post
If Pac had fought Shane and dominated, you would have a completely different view.

But Pac refused to fight Shane, even at a catchweight of 142, so we will never know.
no.......it would be a lot more entertqaaining...........but i would have called an old and inactive shane as much more dangerous fight for PAC..................................shane is old..........nothing to do who he fights..............
STRUGG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2010, 09:45 AM #63
STRUGG STRUGG is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 7,481
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Rep Power: 0
STRUGG has a reputation beyond reputeSTRUGG has a reputation beyond reputeSTRUGG has a reputation beyond reputeSTRUGG has a reputation beyond reputeSTRUGG has a reputation beyond reputeSTRUGG has a reputation beyond reputeSTRUGG has a reputation beyond reputeSTRUGG has a reputation beyond reputeSTRUGG has a reputation beyond reputeSTRUGG has a reputation beyond reputeSTRUGG has a reputation beyond repute
Points: 300,023.18
Bank: 2,679,841,400.23
Total Points: 2,680,141,423.41
Default

bump................................
STRUGG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2010, 09:51 AM #64
EDOMITESLAYER EDOMITESLAYER is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 170
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Rep Power: 0
EDOMITESLAYER has a little shameless behaviour in the past
Points: 5,693.04
Bank: 0.00
Total Points: 5,693.04
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by strugg View Post
no.......it would be a lot more entertqaaining...........but i would have called an old and inactive shane as much more dangerous fight for pac..................................shane is old..........nothing to do who he fights..............
shane got on espn, challenged mayweather called him a ducker etc.

And got his ass whooped. I am sure all this talk of shane is old etc, well mayweather isnt god and cant rewind teh time clock to make him 34 years old.

Now i ask you why was pacquiao fighting clottey, when clottey has lost his last 2 fights prior?

Why would a man get a shot at a title when he loses twice?

Could you imagine the backlash from mayweather if he fought clottey next? Or if he fought nate campbell?

You guys are ****in hypocrites.
EDOMITESLAYER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2010, 09:55 AM #65
STRUGG STRUGG is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 7,481
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Rep Power: 0
STRUGG has a reputation beyond reputeSTRUGG has a reputation beyond reputeSTRUGG has a reputation beyond reputeSTRUGG has a reputation beyond reputeSTRUGG has a reputation beyond reputeSTRUGG has a reputation beyond reputeSTRUGG has a reputation beyond reputeSTRUGG has a reputation beyond reputeSTRUGG has a reputation beyond reputeSTRUGG has a reputation beyond reputeSTRUGG has a reputation beyond repute
Points: 300,023.18
Bank: 2,679,841,400.23
Total Points: 2,680,141,423.41
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EDOMITESLAYER View Post
shane got on espn, challenged mayweather called him a ducker etc.

And got his ass whooped. I am sure all this talk of shane is old etc, well mayweather isnt god and cant rewind teh time clock to make him 34 years old.

Now i ask you why was pacquiao fighting clottey, when clottey has lost his last 2 fights prior?

Why would a man get a shot at a title when he loses twice?

Could you imagine the backlash from mayweather if he fought clottey next? Or if he fought nate campbell?

You guys are ****in hypocrites.


Clottey is a legit WW......who was winning against MARG.......had a close fight/loss against Cotto............and shane was booked for BERTO.......................hope i answered your question
STRUGG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2010, 09:58 AM #66
John Hue John Hue is offline
Undisputed Champion
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,343
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Rep Power: 10
John Hue has a reputation beyond reputeJohn Hue has a reputation beyond reputeJohn Hue has a reputation beyond reputeJohn Hue has a reputation beyond reputeJohn Hue has a reputation beyond reputeJohn Hue has a reputation beyond reputeJohn Hue has a reputation beyond reputeJohn Hue has a reputation beyond reputeJohn Hue has a reputation beyond reputeJohn Hue has a reputation beyond reputeJohn Hue has a reputation beyond repute
Points: 63,019.59
Bank: 0.00
Total Points: 63,019.59
Alzheimer's - Crohn's & Colitis - Cystic Fibrosis - Domestic Violence - Fibromyalgia - Leimyosarcoma - Lupus - Dick Buffman 
Default

That was a very impressive win by Floyd. IMO Moseley despite his age is well preserved and would cause all the welterweights problems. In many ways I would have prefered to have seen him fight Manny. I could see him performing really well against him. The reason Mosely did not look good was because Floyd was on top of his game and was so good it took Moseley out of his game.
John Hue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2010, 10:00 AM #67
STRUGG STRUGG is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 7,481
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Rep Power: 0
STRUGG has a reputation beyond reputeSTRUGG has a reputation beyond reputeSTRUGG has a reputation beyond reputeSTRUGG has a reputation beyond reputeSTRUGG has a reputation beyond reputeSTRUGG has a reputation beyond reputeSTRUGG has a reputation beyond reputeSTRUGG has a reputation beyond reputeSTRUGG has a reputation beyond reputeSTRUGG has a reputation beyond reputeSTRUGG has a reputation beyond repute
Points: 300,023.18
Bank: 2,679,841,400.23
Total Points: 2,680,141,423.41
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Hue View Post
That was a very impressive win by Floyd. IMO Moseley despite his age is well preserved and would cause all the welterweights problems. In many ways I would have prefered to have seen him fight Manny. I could see him performing really well against him. The reason Mosely did not look good was because Floyd was on top of his game and was so good it took Moseley out of his game.
SO you dont think being 38 y/o ..........and 15 month inactive have anything to do with it??...............................im guessing youre gonna quote the MARG win now right????
STRUGG is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Share This With Friends

Tags
bshane, inactive

User Tag List

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

 

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:50 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.