The IBF title - is it really that hard to unify?

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • PittyPat
    Kin yer taste the blood?!
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Jan 2009
    • 11183
    • 696
    • 439
    • 28,773

    #1

    The IBF title - is it really that hard to unify?

    I remember reading a post from someone on here about how the IBF belt (can't remember which division) is "almost impossible" to unify, or something along those lines. What would be examples of this?
  • DeanoFlash
    Contender
    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
    • Aug 2009
    • 331
    • 19
    • 0
    • 14,600

    #2
    delete....
    Last edited by DeanoFlash; 12-22-2009, 06:42 AM.

    Comment

    • Cote
      Up and Comer
      Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
      • Apr 2008
      • 39
      • 2
      • 0
      • 6,279

      #3
      I'n welter Margarito and Clottey both were striped to prevent unification in their fights with Cotto.

      Also in Japan the IBF doesn't count as a major title. Only WBC and WBA.

      Comment

      • PittyPat
        Kin yer taste the blood?!
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Jan 2009
        • 11183
        • 696
        • 439
        • 28,773

        #4
        Yeah, I remember them stripping Clottey earlier this year... but wasn't it because he chose to fight Cotto instead of a mandatory?

        Comment

        • boxerca
          Up and Comer
          • Dec 2009
          • 95
          • 4
          • 1
          • 6,193

          #5
          Originally posted by PittyPat
          Yeah, I remember them stripping Clottey earlier this year... but wasn't it because he chose to fight Cotto instead of a mandatory?
          I think that's right and Clottey blamed Cotto for not filing the proper paperwork for it.

          I remember the IBF title was unified with the IBO title when Chad Dawson had it. That's the last type of unification with the belt, that I know of.

          Comment

          • El_Cholo
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • May 2009
            • 2330
            • 118
            • 48
            • 11,120

            #6
            after Calzaghe beat Lacy to unify the WBO & IBF SMW titles, the IBF gave him a mandatory, so Calzaghe vacated.

            Lacy's IBO title was not on the line I think.

            Comment

            • dans
              Journeyman
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Jun 2006
              • 6835
              • 212
              • 134
              • 13,712

              #7
              Originally posted by PittyPat
              Yeah, I remember them stripping Clottey earlier this year... but wasn't it because he chose to fight Cotto instead of a mandatory?
              Yes, I blame that one on Clottey. He had plenty of time to defend that title and he didn't. His own damn fault.

              Comment

              • Animalistic 5.0
                Banned
                • Sep 2009
                • 1853
                • 72
                • 9
                • 2,084

                #8
                Trinidad had the IBF belt when he unified with De La Hoya in 99. But yeah they also stripped Clottey before the Cotto fight.

                Comment

                • PittyPat
                  Kin yer taste the blood?!
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Jan 2009
                  • 11183
                  • 696
                  • 439
                  • 28,773

                  #9
                  Also, none of the beltholders at 140 seem to be eager to grab Urango's IBF belt. I wonder why that is? Sure, he can punch hard, but he's still one of the easiest to beat in that division. Maybe they want to, but can't get the opportunity for unification?

                  Likewise you see the IBF title at 147 not even being mentioned in the same breath as its WBA, WBC and WBO counterparts - all of which are very close to being unified next year. It went from Clottey to Hlatshwayo to Zaveck. Who knows where it'll end up next...

                  Comment

                  • Animalistic 5.0
                    Banned
                    • Sep 2009
                    • 1853
                    • 72
                    • 9
                    • 2,084

                    #10
                    Originally posted by PittyPat
                    Also, none of the beltholders at 140 seem to be eager to grab Urango's IBF belt. I wonder why that is? Sure, he can punch hard, but he's still one of the easiest to beat in that division. Maybe they want to, but can't get the opportunity for unification?

                    Likewise you see the IBF title at 147 not even being mentioned in the same breath as its WBA, WBC and WBO counterparts - all of which are very close to being unified next year. It went from Clottey to Hlatshwayo to Zaveck. Who knows where it'll end up next...
                    It could be that they are not as connected with big time promoters as much as the other promotions.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP