I remember reading a post from someone on here about how the IBF belt (can't remember which division) is "almost impossible" to unify, or something along those lines. What would be examples of this?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The IBF title - is it really that hard to unify?
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by PittyPat View PostYeah, I remember them stripping Clottey earlier this year... but wasn't it because he chose to fight Cotto instead of a mandatory?
I remember the IBF title was unified with the IBO title when Chad Dawson had it. That's the last type of unification with the belt, that I know of.
Comment
-
-
Trinidad had the IBF belt when he unified with De La Hoya in 99. But yeah they also stripped Clottey before the Cotto fight.
Comment
-
Also, none of the beltholders at 140 seem to be eager to grab Urango's IBF belt. I wonder why that is? Sure, he can punch hard, but he's still one of the easiest to beat in that division. Maybe they want to, but can't get the opportunity for unification?
Likewise you see the IBF title at 147 not even being mentioned in the same breath as its WBA, WBC and WBO counterparts - all of which are very close to being unified next year. It went from Clottey to Hlatshwayo to Zaveck. Who knows where it'll end up next...
Comment
-
Originally posted by PittyPat View PostAlso, none of the beltholders at 140 seem to be eager to grab Urango's IBF belt. I wonder why that is? Sure, he can punch hard, but he's still one of the easiest to beat in that division. Maybe they want to, but can't get the opportunity for unification?
Likewise you see the IBF title at 147 not even being mentioned in the same breath as its WBA, WBC and WBO counterparts - all of which are very close to being unified next year. It went from Clottey to Hlatshwayo to Zaveck. Who knows where it'll end up next...
Comment
Comment