My thoughts on the Froch/Dirrell fight..

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Zhaakal
    Banned
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Dec 2007
    • 2826
    • 261
    • 234
    • 3,134

    #1

    My thoughts on the Froch/Dirrell fight..

    First of all, i think Froch won. If it would have been an amateur bout, then yes, Dirrell should have won couse he piled up more points. But the thing is that this is PRO boxing, Froch is the CHAMPION, you can't take the belt away by running away. He hit Froch a lot but those were flashy shots, Froch landed the harder blows, which count more in PRO boxing. I dunno why it took the ref so long to take away a point from Dirrell, that was just ugly. Froch was the AGGRESSOR, CHAMPION and landed the harder blows in my view. NB! Dirrells handspeed is sick, give the boy some time and he could DEFINATELY be something special in pro boxing.
  • S.G.
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • May 2008
    • 9412
    • 296
    • 635
    • 16,360

    #2
    what the hell does froch being the champion have to do with anything? does that count for 5 extra points or something?

    stop trying to justify the robbery
    Last edited by S.G.; 10-18-2009, 09:49 AM.

    Comment

    • Zhaakal
      Banned
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Dec 2007
      • 2826
      • 261
      • 234
      • 3,134

      #3
      Originally posted by S.G.
      what the hell does froch being the champion have anything to do with anything? does that count for 5 extra points or something?

      stop trying to justify the robbery
      This wasn't a robbery. A close fight but not a robbery. Running away from the champ and holding constantly doesn't win you the belt.

      Comment

      • S.G.
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • May 2008
        • 9412
        • 296
        • 635
        • 16,360

        #4
        Originally posted by Zhaakal
        This wasn't a robbery. A close fight but not a robbery. Running away from the champ and holding constantly doesn't win you the belt.
        Nor does plodding around without commiting to getting on the inside and landing 3 punches a round.

        Dirrell didn't do enough? But Froch did absolutely nothing... You've done enough when you've done more than the other guy and Dirrell beat Froch comfortably

        Comment

        • DC Fight Fan
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Jun 2009
          • 1852
          • 61
          • 40
          • 8,111

          #5
          Originally posted by Zhaakal
          Froch landed the harder blows, which count more in PRO boxing.
          This is where your premise fails. Dirrell landed the harder shots more consistently. Dirrell hurt Froch not the other way around.

          Comment

          • Bhopreign
            Banned
            • Jun 2006
            • 11273
            • 419
            • 100
            • 12,036

            #6
            Originally posted by Zhaakal
            First of all, i think Froch won.
            I stopped reading right here.

            Comment

            • swizz
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Jun 2009
              • 2782
              • 100
              • 238
              • 9,312

              #7
              it was a robbery sorry thread failed
              it was robbery you have to land some punches froch look slow and off target at times confused

              Comment

              • swizz
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Jun 2009
                • 2782
                • 100
                • 238
                • 9,312

                #8
                and froch was the one that got hurt

                Comment

                • rich6666
                  Interim Champion
                  Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                  • Nov 2008
                  • 541
                  • 53
                  • 253
                  • 7,226

                  #9
                  Froch did win and pretty convincingly to my eye.

                  Comment

                  • Shadows
                    All-Time Great
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Jul 2009
                    • 8293
                    • 192
                    • 250
                    • 15,434

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Zhaakal
                    First of all, i think Froch won. If it would have been an amateur bout, then yes, Dirrell should have won couse he piled up more points. But the thing is that this is PRO boxing, Froch is the CHAMPION, you can't take the belt away by running away. He hit Froch a lot but those were flashy shots, Froch landed the harder blows, which count more in PRO boxing. I dunno why it took the ref so long to take away a point from Dirrell, that was just ugly. Froch was the AGGRESSOR, CHAMPION and landed the harder blows in my view. NB! Dirrells handspeed is sick, give the boy some time and he could DEFINATELY be something special in pro boxing.
                    So how did you score the fight?

                    I didn't think Froch landed much of anything. A lot of what he landed was on the shoulders and arms.

                    He was the aggressor and came forward, but couldn't cut off the ring and trap Dirrell. He was ineffective, IMO.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP