If Toney fought Hearns at 160/168? - Boxing Forum
  Trending Topics  | Free Registration  | The Team
Boxing Champions |  Boxing Schedule |  Boxing Video  |  Boxing History   |  Pound For Pound  | Lounge  | The Wire | Arcade

Navigation
Go Back   Boxing Forum > Boxing Forums > Boxing History
Reply
Thread Navigation

#1
Old 10-08-2009, 01:58 PM
Benncollinsaad
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 4,248
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Rep Power: 0 Benncollinsaad has a reputation beyond reputeBenncollinsaad has a reputation beyond reputeBenncollinsaad has a reputation beyond reputeBenncollinsaad has a reputation beyond reputeBenncollinsaad has a reputation beyond reputeBenncollinsaad has a reputation beyond reputeBenncollinsaad has a reputation beyond reputeBenncollinsaad has a reputation beyond reputeBenncollinsaad has a reputation beyond reputeBenncollinsaad has a reputation beyond reputeBenncollinsaad has a reputation beyond repute
Points: 422,730.93
Bank: 0.00
Total Points: 422,730.93
Cheers for green k man - The Jackal Cheers! - Carnivore 
Default If Toney fought Hearns at 160/168?

Altho Hearns was at his best at 154, he still was a dangerous contender at both 160 and 168. And Toney we don't have to talk about. Who'd win?
Reply With Quote
Benncollinsaad is offline
Advertisements
>>>TO REMOVE THESE ADS, PLEASE REGISTER HERE FOR FREE<<<
#2
Old 10-08-2009, 02:04 PM
mike ruler
Interim Champion
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Da Northside O
Age: 25
Posts: 596
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Rep Power: 0 mike ruler is infamous around these partsmike ruler is infamous around these partsmike ruler is infamous around these partsmike ruler is infamous around these partsmike ruler is infamous around these partsmike ruler is infamous around these partsmike ruler is infamous around these partsmike ruler is infamous around these partsmike ruler is infamous around these partsmike ruler is infamous around these partsmike ruler is infamous around these parts
Points: 167,945.85
Bank: 1,340,952.32
Total Points: 1,508,898.17
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Benncollinsaad View Post
Altho Hearns was at his best at 154, he still was a dangerous contender at both 160 and 168. And Toney we don't have to talk about. Who'd win?
Toney struggled against taller fighters. Hearns being 6'2 with amazing reach would give him trouble with that jab from the outside. Toney has his moments but Hearns UD.
Reply With Quote
mike ruler is offline
#3
Old 10-08-2009, 02:05 PM
Bushidō
GGG-Unit
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Golden State Of Mind
Age: 32
Posts: 6,212
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Rep Power: 23 Bushidō has a reputation beyond reputeBushidō has a reputation beyond reputeBushidō has a reputation beyond reputeBushidō has a reputation beyond reputeBushidō has a reputation beyond reputeBushidō has a reputation beyond reputeBushidō has a reputation beyond reputeBushidō has a reputation beyond reputeBushidō has a reputation beyond reputeBushidō has a reputation beyond reputeBushidō has a reputation beyond repute
Points: 1,098,966.12
Bank: 14,027,542,143,904.28
Total Points: 14,027,543,242,870.40
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Benncollinsaad View Post
Altho Hearns was at his best at 154, he still was a dangerous contender at both 160 and 168. And Toney we don't have to talk about. Who'd win?
When you look at Toney there is too many IF's. He was so inconsistent at times with his training. But I think with a fight vs Hearns he would have to be at his best to beat him and he would know that. Hearns would probably take the early rounds but I see Toney winning late in the fight with a stoppage. Catching Hearns with a counter right.
Reply With Quote
Bushidō is offline
Reply

Share This With Friends

Tags
160/168?, fought, hearns, toney

User Tag List

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Cookie Policy - Privacy Policy - Submit News - Feedback - Site Map - Advertise with Us

Copyright 2003-2016 BoxingScene LLC All rights reserved.

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:50 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.