Quote:
Originally Posted by them_apples
1) Leonard is better than Whitaker, faster, and bigger.
2) Whitaker can't hurt Duran if Duran let him hit his face
3) Duran went toe to toe with one of the best southpaws ever at middleweight
Duran would handle Whitaker.
|
1) Leonard may have been a better all-around fighter and ranked higher historically, but in no way was he a better out-fighter
2) Fighters who win solely on points don't need to hurt their opponent, and Whitaker was one of the best points fighters ever
3) Hagler was not remotely stylistically similar to Whitaker - false analogy
If Duran won, it would be by razor-thin points decision, not "handling".