Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Why does Pacquiao ONLY fight Mexican fighters?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Why does Pacquiao ONLY fight Mexican fighters?

    The Ring's Super Bantamweight rankings in 2002 (Pacquiao's last year at 122)

    4 of the top 5 were Mexican or Mexican-American. With the sole NON-Mexican/Mexican-American being Pacquiao himself.

    Ayala #1 , Larios #3 , Sanchez #4 and Vazquez #5.

    The Ring's Featherweight rankings at the end of 2003 (When Pacquiao was the lineal champion at 126)

    4 of the top 5 fighters ranked below Pacquiao were Mexican or Mexican-American.

    Marquez #1 , Barrera #2 , Medina #4 and Tapia #5.

    The Ring's Super Featherweight rankings in 2005 (The year Pacquiao jumped to 130)

    2 of the top guys and the top 2 in fact were Mexican or Mexican-American.

    Barrera #1 and Morales #2. Marquez , Juarez and Soto would all later join the top 5 at 130 by the time Pacquiao won his title.

    The Ring's Lightweight rankings at the end of 2007(Right before Pacquiao left 130)

    4 of the top 5 fighters were Mexican or Mexican-American.

    Diaz (Juan) #1 , Diaz (David) #2 , Santa Cruz #3 , Diaz (Julio) #4.



    Pacquiao ONLY fights the BEST and in the lower weight classes.....the Mexicans ARE the BEST.
    Last edited by WhoreUs; 05-24-2009, 03:27 PM.

  • #2
    dont forget the lineal champ at 140...Ricardo Hattoniguez

    Comment


    • #3
      its just htat mexicans r small thats why...

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Makavelli View Post
        dont forget the lineal champ at 140...Ricardo Hattoniguez
        does the manchester mexican count?

        we need a ruling on this.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by supRa View Post
          its just htat mexicans r small thats why...
          yeah. it has nothing to do with the fact that mexicans can fight.

          Comment


          • #6
            Because they stand in front of him. If he fights floyd he isnt gonna know what to do with a slick boxer

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Mr._Pink View Post
              does the manchester mexican count?

              we need a ruling on this.


              he drinks, he brawls, goes out on his shield, he counts

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Mr._Pink View Post
                does the manchester mexican count?

                we need a ruling on this.
                on one hand the manchester mexican; yes, on the other, he's pretty pale skinned for a mexican. he got KOd quicker than mexicans usually do too. At a push i'd go for why not!

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by KILLA RIGHT View Post
                  Because they stand in front of him. If he fights floyd he isnt gonna know what to do with a slick boxer
                  this has nothing to do with floyd.

                  it's about pacquiao and how the mexicans dominate the lower weight classes.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Makavelli View Post
                    he drinks, he brawls, goes out on his shield, he counts
                    I think roach only fights guys that stand in front of manny like hatton and mexicans. Does he know manny couldnt handle a slick good defensive boxer? THATS WHAT MADE THAT DUMBASS ARTICLE OF MANNY DOESN'T FIGHT BLACKS ******.ITS NOT THAT THERE BLACK BUT HE DOESN'T FIGHT SLICK BOXERS.IT WAS ****** TO MAKE IT A RACE ISSUE

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP