How Liberals, the Green Movement, Abortion, Gay Marriage are all connected

[ILLuminato]

In reality, Global Warming is a hoax and its a great thing there is a great number of people these days opening their eyes to the "inconvenient truth" (to liberals like Gore). Like most of the Left's policies, Environmentalism is not a matter of what works or what is, it is a matter of advancing the liberal agenda and controlling the citizens.

In a nutshell, here is the argument from liberals whether they admit it or not. Our world is overwhemingly overpopulated and we are the enemy. More humans= more carbon footprints. In order to reduce our carbon footprints, we must shrink our population. This can be accomplished through: A) Abortion (this is the most common). The less people born means less carbon footprints, this is quite obvious. B) Gay Marriage. Not only does this encourage gays to not make babies, gays reduce carbon footprint even further because they also live together, share cars and homes. This is why the gays' biggest fans are the green hippies. C) High taxes.. First of all, if taxes are high, less gas is consumed. The government also subsidizes energy for companies who fit their environmental standards.

Global Warming is the left's perfect storm — a force to demolish faith, family and freedom. There's no area of our lives that can't be invaded — taxed, controlled, regulated or obliterated — in the name of serving and protecting the planet.

With that said, the Environmentalists biggest opponents are the Conservatives and religion. Obviously, Christianity doesn't support Gay Marriage or abortion. Now whether you are Christian are not religious at all, if you're a Constitution fan, there are a few words which greatly oppose this. They are actually two word. Life and liberty. We live in a country where we pride ourselves on never leaving a soldier behind in combat no mater how dead they are, yet we never give the unborn a child a chance (this goes much deeper, like how irresponsible we've become about the act of sex, that's a different discussion).

On the strength of that, these are not the only ways environmentalists and especially liberals are trying to control the way you live. Al Gore recently came up with a "low carbon diet" (or so I've heard), they want to force you to drive a car they choose, and the way you live. One must question the popular opinion and create their own opinion in these uncertain times. Censorship is coming too, by the way.

http://frontpagemagazine.com/readArt...px?ARTID=30790
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/ear...s-predict.html
http://www.globalwarminghoax.com/com...ent.news.109.3

[Mech.]

The "low carbon diet" is soylent green.

[Danny Gunz]

This is just dumb

[ILLuminato]

Originally Posted by Danny Gunz

This is just dumb

It's not gonna be dumb when the government takes control of your everyday life.

[TheJoker]

As long as we're posting tinfoil hat conspiracy theories lets talk about the moon landing, 9/11 as an inside job and the Nazi's having a moon base...

Originally Posted by ILLuminato

In reality, Global Warming is a hoax and its a great thing there is a great number of people these days opening their eyes to the "inconvenient truth" (to liberals like Gore). Like most of the Left's policies, Environmentalism is not a matter of what works or what is, it is a matter of advancing the liberal agenda and controlling the citizens.

Global organizations ( not just liberal lefts ) have concluded in four reports available at that link Global Warming is a reality. So with the majority of the worldwide experts in consensus holding global warming to be true, this is a global conspiracy directed against Conservative Americans and the American Christian population?

Originally Posted by ILLuminato

In a nutshell, here is the argument from liberals whether they admit it or not. Our world is overwhemingly overpopulated and we are the enemy. More humans= more carbon footprints. In order to reduce our carbon footprints, we must shrink our population. This can be accomplished through: A) Abortion (this is the most common). The less people born means less carbon footprints, this is quite obvious. B) Gay Marriage. Not only does this encourage gays to not make babies, gays reduce carbon footprint even further because they also live together, share cars and homes. This is why the gays' biggest fans are the green hippies. C) High taxes.. First of all, if taxes are high, less gas is consumed. The government also subsidizes energy for companies who fit their environmental standards.

So, you claim "I know what the liberals want, even if they don't say this is what they want" in a nutshell. You can not possibly attempt to claim you can tell what another individual is really thinking, that's absurd unless you want to claim you are now telepathic. Since your entire argument hinges on the assertion that your view of a liberal agenda is correct and your argument hinges not on factual evidence but that you know what they are thinking your argument breaks down quite quickly.

Originally Posted by ILLuminato

With that said, the Environmentalists biggest opponents are the Conservatives and religion. Obviously, Christianity doesn't support Gay Marriage or abortion. Now whether you are Christian are not religious at all, if you're a Constitution fan, there are a few words which greatly oppose this. They are actually two word. Life and liberty. We live in a country where we pride ourselves on never leaving a soldier behind in combat no mater how dead they are, yet we never give the unborn a child a chance (this goes much deeper, like how irresponsible we've become about the act of sex, that's a different discussion).

Now we can list the logical fallacies...
Poisoning the Well - You've already portrayed the political left to be lying, deceitful, manipulative and untrustworthy and attempt to set up Christianity and Conservatives as the antithesis of those qualities.
False Dilemma - You assign a position to the political left which is based off your personal belief and attempt to prove how wrong the position of the left is. In reality, all you have done is proven your perception of the political left's true agenda is flawed.
Composition - All the attributes you have assigned to the political left are based on your composition ( an opinion )
Ignoratio elenchi - Your thesis is based off your opinion and opinion is not considered a fact.
There's more, but that's enough to prove my point. Your thesis is illogical.

Originally Posted by ILLuminato

On the strength of that, these are not the only ways environmentalists and especially liberals are trying to control the way you live. Al Gore recently came up with a "low carbon diet" (or so I've heard), they want to force you to drive a car they choose, and the way you live. One must question the popular opinion and create their own opinion in these uncertain times. Censorship is coming too, by the way.

On the strength of what argument exactly? The argument of your opinion of a political ideology based on personal bias? Honestly, it lends no weight to your thesis in the slightest.

[Danny Gunz]

Originally Posted by ILLuminato

It's not gonna be dumb when the government takes control of your everyday life.

And barrack obama personally rapes my family

[ILLuminato]

Originally Posted by JackNapier

Global organizations ( not just liberal lefts ) have concluded in four reports available at that link Global Warming is a reality. So with the majority of the worldwide experts in consensus holding global warming to be true, this is a global conspiracy directed against Conservative Americans and the American Christian population?

So, you claim "I know what the liberals want, even if they don't say this is what they want" in a nutshell. You can not possibly attempt to claim you can tell what another individual is really thinking, that's absurd unless you want to claim you are now telepathic. Since your entire argument hinges on the assertion that your view of a liberal agenda is correct and your argument hinges not on factual evidence but that you know what they are thinking your argument breaks down quite quickly.


Now we can list the logical fallacies...
Poisoning the Well - You've already portrayed the political left to be lying, deceitful, manipulative and untrustworthy and attempt to set up Christianity and Conservatives as the antithesis of those qualities.
False Dilemma - You assign a position to the political left which is based off your personal belief and attempt to prove how wrong the position of the left is. In reality, all you have done is proven your perception of the political left's true agenda is flawed.
Composition - All the attributes you have assigned to the political left are based on your composition ( an opinion )
Ignoratio elenchi - Your thesis is based off your opinion and opinion is not considered a fact.
There's more, but that's enough to prove my point. Your thesis is illogical.

On the strength of what argument exactly? The argument of your opinion of a political ideology based on personal bias? Honestly, it lends no weight to your thesis in the slightest.

I'm not sure you read any of the links I attached at the bottom of the post. I already know you are a moron, just like SquealPiggy and others like you, who claim anything but radical liberalism is "illogical", although the real illogical is liberalism itself.

I know what liberals want. Heck, everybody knows what liberals want. It's not too hard to see...

This is your second attack on an argument of mine using only you're philosophic-esque attack on my use of "opinion". Meanwhile, this time I included numerous sources.

However, it is impossible to deny that environmentalists want a lower population. Now, I know you're going to give you your "OPINION DOESN'T MATTER YOU DONT KNOW WHAT THEY WANT"...YES, I DO.

P.S. Global Warming is liberal lie. Just like almost anything they do.

[Welter_Skelter]

The Commies are taking over..And only the Commies will tell you otherwise..

There is enough Counter evidence against man made global warming.. to suggest it is in fact a hoax.. or at the very least a natural occurrence..

I expect much slander and name calling now.. it's what Commies do.. when someone disagrees with them..

"if you can't attack the argument.. attack the man"

[ILLuminato]

Originally Posted by Welter_Skelter

The Commies are taking over..And only the Commies will tell you otherwise..

There is enough Counter evidence against man made global warming.. to suggest it is in fact a hoax.. or at the very least a natural occurrence..

I expect much slander and name calling now.. it's what Commies do.. when someone disagrees with them..

"if you can't attack the argument.. attack the man"

Ice levels in the arctic have risen in the past few years.

The Commies aren't taking over, the radical liberal Socialists are. Easily confusable, however.

I'm pretty convinced that Jack Napier is SquealPiggy's alt. The two post extremely similarly and seem to know a bit about philosophy. Plus they both take the time to chop up arguments to spin the opposing argument.

The Spin stops here.

[Spare Moody]

whatever.



i just use the common sense approach: Don't Be an Idiot.

try that method and it really doesn't matter if Al Gore's a conspiracist, or gay marriage is the answer to all problems or if Liberals are in fact the enemy. if you use my Don't Be an Idiot method then you actually learn to think for yourself and don't need hyperlinks to do it for you.

i know it may seem crazy but just.......get a little crazy.
try it out kiddos.