A scoring lesson for the haters, racists and nationalists that infect the forum....

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • bsrizpac
    Banned
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • May 2004
    • 6837
    • 289
    • 21
    • 7,134

    #1

    A scoring lesson for the haters, racists and nationalists that infect the forum....

    Attn: the above.
    Re: Boxing score.
    Body:

    Just like to give you guys a quick update on how to score fights.

    1. Punches to the opponents gloves, elbows, arms, shoulders, back, back of the head, back of the neck, legs etc. DO NO and should not count as scoring blows. No matter what the HBO commentary team says or what judges rob what fighter.

    The scoring zone is small and simple: Head, neck (front), chest, naval to the beltline (which SHOULD sit at the waist- I'm looking YOU Oscar).

    2. "workrate" is NOT a scoring criteria. It's called EFFECTIVE Aggressiveness. Not "workrate". The only time "workrate" should be used is if one guy is completely not doing ANYTHING AND all the other scoring criteria are exhausted.

    3. The scoring criteria are as follows and considered in THIS ORDER:

    Professional Boxing is judged on (descriptions taken From Harold Lederman):

    A. Clean Punching- A clean punch is one that lands on a scoring area (face or side of head, not including the back of the head; the front and sides of the torso) with the knuckle portion of the glove. In amateur boxing, the scoring portion of the glove is white. Though a professional glove lacks such markings, the scoring portion of the glove is basically the same.

    Clean punches will land flush, not glancing or partially blocked by one's opponent. "Slapping" or "backhanding" is not allowed.

    B. Effective Aggressiveness- Effective aggression is demonstrated when a fighter presses forward, and in doing so, scores more clean punches, or more damaging blows, than his opponent. If a boxer is a particularly hard puncher, even blows that are not landed particularly clean, but obviously affect his opponent, are given scoring weight.

    C.Ring Generalship-The ability to control the pace and style of a fight is ring generalship. For instance, a high volume-punching brawler will attempt to force a "stick and move" boxer into a slugfest. Conversely, the pure boxer will attempt to slow the pace of the fight by keeping his opponent at the end of his jab and use angles and feints in order to set up his heavier punches.

    It is imperative that professional judges comprehend each fighter's respective style in order to understand who is controlling the action and demonstrating superior ring generalship.

    D.Defense-Probably the most ignored, if not maligned, of the four judging criteria is defense. There have been boxers who were such defensive wizards, such as Willie Pep, or Pernell Whitaker, that it was virtually impossible for judges not to recognize their skill. It is said that Pep once won a round against Jackie Graves in 1946 without landing a single punch. In truth, the featherweight Pep landed a few jabs during that round, but such a story is remarkable only because it is so rare, as defense is so poorly appreciated.

    Defense is the ability to avoid punshment. A boxer with greater reach than his opponent may stay on the outside and use his footwork to avoid punches--a style often frowned on by judges. One might stay inside and slip punches. Another option is to block an opponent's punches with one's gloves, arms and shoulders, or the highly skilled fighter may choose to use a combination of defensive techniques, depending on the situation.


    4. IF ALL the above options are exhausted you can use "workrate" to decide a score in a fight.
    -------------------------------


    I am tired of seeing people get this wrong over and over and over again. Any questions please ask me on this thread, and I'll help you clear it up.

    Thanks.
  • hammerhiem
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • May 2008
    • 4877
    • 129
    • 102
    • 11,163

    #2
    A scoring lesson for the haters, racists and nationalists that infect the forum
    Why not just come out and say it "A scoring lesson for the Calzaghe fans that infect the forum"

    You're pretty much a one fighter poster, I can't recall you ever posting about anyone else.

    Comment

    • bsrizpac
      Banned
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • May 2004
      • 6837
      • 289
      • 21
      • 7,134

      #3
      Originally posted by hammerhiem
      Why not just come out and say it "A scoring lesson for the Calzaghe fans that infect the forum"

      You're pretty much a one fighter poster, I can't recall you ever posting about anyone else.
      Actually this was aimed at some other people, but sure keep crying.

      This has nothing to do with Joe or I'd have highlighted the part about NO SLAPPING.

      But thanks for being a fan. Comment on what I wrote, not what you think of me...

      Comment

      • hammerhiem
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • May 2008
        • 4877
        • 129
        • 102
        • 11,163

        #4
        Originally posted by bsrizpac
        Actually this was aimed at some other people, but sure keep crying.

        This has nothing to do with Joe or I'd have highlighted the part about NO SLAPPING.

        But thanks for being a fan. Comment on what I wrote, not what you think of me...
        I'm teasing you mate you should know that by now.

        Comment

        • bsrizpac
          Banned
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • May 2004
          • 6837
          • 289
          • 21
          • 7,134

          #5
          Originally posted by hammerhiem
          I'm teasing you mate you should know that by now.
          Yeah I know, and I'm hitting you right back.

          For reference this is aimed at a few fights in particular and not just one.

          One recent one is FMJ vs. Castillo 1. That morons keep bringing up, for what reason I don't know.

          Comment

          • SuperKing
            Contender
            Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
            • Feb 2009
            • 148
            • 1
            • 3
            • 6,238

            #6
            Hit the nail right on the head. Its got to be quality over quantity.

            Comment

            • bsrizpac
              Banned
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • May 2004
              • 6837
              • 289
              • 21
              • 7,134

              #7
              Originally posted by SuperKing
              Hit the nail right on the head. Its got to be quality over quantity.
              Quantity is scored in the Amateurs. At least it's supposed to be. The current trend is away from that and it's sickening.

              Comment

              • BadNewz
                Interim Champion
                • Jun 2008
                • 889
                • 105
                • 0
                • 7,016

                #8
                The only Floyd vs. Castillo fight that was wrongly scored was the rematch, which the biased judges tried to make artificially close. The first fight was scored correctly. Floyd had an off-night and was fighting with a torn rotator cuff (an injury that made Vitali Klitschko quit like a coward), but he still dominated Castillo and won nine or ten rounds. Castillo hit Floyd's arms a lot, which counts for nothing.

                Comment

                • bsrizpac
                  Banned
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • May 2004
                  • 6837
                  • 289
                  • 21
                  • 7,134

                  #9
                  Originally posted by BadNewz
                  The only Floyd vs. Castillo fight that was wrongly scored was the rematch, which the biased judges tried to make artificially close. The first fight was scored correctly. Floyd had an off-night and was fighting with a torn rotator cuff (an injury that made Vitali Klitschko quit like a coward), but he still dominated Castillo and won nine or ten rounds. Castillo hit Floyd's arms a lot, which counts for nothing.
                  I'm a huge Castillo fan but there you go. The bold part is VERY CORRECT.

                  Comment

                  • MANGLER
                    Sex Tape Flop Artist
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Feb 2008
                    • 30142
                    • 1,705
                    • 2,355
                    • 46,598

                    #10
                    This is a good thread wit strong, valid points TS. But despite workrate not bein 1 of the 4 standard criteria, it's wrong to assume it shouldn't count. In close rds, activity always counts. It shouldn't be the be all end all, but it's important. If 1 guy throws 45 punches and lands 20, but his opponent throws 110 and lands 25, who you think the judges will favor? In a fight between accuracy and activity, the accurate guy can't just land cleanly; his shots have to be hard, they have to move his opponent, visibly snap his head back or double him over. If the accuracy is there but the impact ain't visible, the efficiency will be drowned out by the other guy's sheer volume.
                    Last edited by MANGLER; 04-25-2009, 01:09 PM.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP