The Reason Why Pacquiao's Early Lost Record Doesn't Matter

[Fights]

Asides from it happened when he's only 17 years and 20 years old (Pac is a much, much different fighter now), here's a video which is inspiring for those who failed yet despite it all kept on going to eventually achieved success:

[J.B.moneY.]

Asides from it happened when he's only 17 years and 20 years old (Pac is a much, much different fighter now), here's a video which is inspiring for those who failed yet despite it all kept on going to eventually achieved success:

like hatton who failed to beat the p4p number 1 once before, but this time is trying again more determined

[Benny Leonard]

Manny is obviously a better fighter now. He prepares better than before.
He is technically better, physically matured, studies well before he goes into the ring, and seems to have more confidence.

[Benny Leonard]

like hatton who failed to beat the p4p number 1 once before, but this time is trying again more determined

And credit for him for going in a new direction to improve.

[Rich Loc]

Also Pacman fighting at 106 doesn't matter as well since he was 16, so no excuses that he is too small

[strugler]

A loss is a loss, some people overrate the " 0 " anyway.

[Benny Leonard]

A loss is a loss, some people overrate the " 0 " anyway.

I think he may be talking about how it doesn't matter in relation to "now."

The loss is on his record and you cannot get rid of it but I don't think that was the point; although, maybe I'm just assuming.

[J.B.moneY.]

Manny is obviously a better fighter now. He prepares better than before.
He is technically better, physically matured, studies well before he goes into the ring, and seems to have more confidence.

like i've said before i have nothing but respect for manny, if he beats my ricky, no shame in that, hatton got beat by only the best....i just think its need to be mentioned is i think these 2 guys genuinely like each other, based on what you see at the pressers....there just competitors...and usually were so used to "we hate each other" before fights

[strugler]

I think he may be talking about how it doesn't matter in relation to "now."

The loss is on his record and you cannot get rid of it but I don't think that was the point; although, maybe I'm just assuming.

Ofcourse it doesnt relate to now imho. Last time pac loss(legitimately) was against El terrible. I just dont think we need to justify a great fighter's loss to make him look "greater".imo.

[J.B.moneY.]

Ofcourse it doesnt relate to now imho. Last time pac loss(legitimately) was against El terrible. I just dont think we need to justify a great fighter's loss to make him look "greater".imo.

i've watched all the morales fights about 15 times recentley and this is one reason why i think hatton's got a good shot....is morales really challenged him and threw his timing off on that fight...i see hatton doing someting similar...the last guy that forced the matter with pac was morales 1