Why are Brittish PPV #'s being counted or even mentioned in regards to Hatton?

[2501]

When debating this whole purse share situation? Those numbers are irrelevant as only one party is gets a percentage from them which is Hatton is that not right?

Hatton's only had 1 PPV event in the United States against someone who already was a draw. His fight with Malignaggi garnered low ratings. Its not even a question who deserves the bigger purse.

[rizkybizness]

that makes a difference in hatton wonderland

[boxasmash]

Originally Posted by 2501

When debating this whole purse share situation? Those numbers are irrelevant as only one party is gets a percentage from them which is Hatton is that not right?

Hatton's only had 1 PPV event in the United States against someone who already was a draw. His fight with Malignaggi garnered low ratings. Its not even a question who deserves the bigger purse.

the UK ppv revenue is shared between the fighters.

hatton sold 1.3 M PPVS in the uk for his fight with mayweather at 5 am local time.

thats crazy, not to mention the majority of the fans in the arena were hattons'. hatton deserves at least equal purse

[K.Webster]

Originally Posted by 2501

When debating this whole purse share situation? Those numbers are irrelevant as only one party is gets a percentage from them which is Hatton is that not right?

Hatton's only had 1 PPV event in the United States against someone who already was a draw. His fight with Malignaggi garnered low ratings. Its not even a question who deserves the bigger purse.

Pacquaio was going to get 50% of the British PPV. Even though Hatton is the main draw.

Thus 50-50 is very fair on Pacquaio.

[Left Hook Tua]

Originally Posted by 2501

When debating this whole purse share situation? Those numbers are irrelevant as only one party is gets a percentage from them which is Hatton is that not right?

Hatton's only had 1 PPV event in the United States against someone who already was a draw. His fight with Malignaggi garnered low ratings. Its not even a question who deserves the bigger purse.

the original offer was 60-40 for pac in the u.s. , pac keeps philippine tv money and hatton keeps british ppv money.

arum wasn't gonna fall for that that's why he asked for 50-50 for both u.s. and u.k. money.

hatton then gave in.

with 50-50 of u.s. and u.k. money and manny with exclusivity on philippine money......manny gets more.

[-----------]

Originally Posted by 2501

Those numbers are irrelevant as only one party is gets a percentage from them which is Hatton is that not right?

That's not right.

Get your ****ing facts right before posting biased ass ****.


Both fighters recieve equal revenue from the British PPV's


Now **** off

[boxasmash]

manny is definitely being a ***** about this, not even a fight with floyd could get him more money.