Bernard Hopkins: All Time Great...

Truth

I say yes obviously. I just want to see if there are still people that don't believe...

AntonTheMeh

this should be pretty obvious.

Truth

i just want to see how many people jump on the weight theory.

Pugilistic™

Of course.

Dan...

I highly doubt anyone would argue against it, even prior to the Pavlik win.

WhoreUs

yes.

his resume speaks for itself. i still voted no out of spite though.

he's an atg. not one of the top ones. he's no ali or robinson but he's up there.

higher than floyd. i know that much.

Truth

but you know how theres people that say...tarver was weight drained, and the rest were fighters that moved up. I want to see how many of them are around.

Xol

I really don't see how the weight theory holds any water here. Didn't Pavlik come into the last Taylor fight at 169?

Truth

Even the Winky win, yeah he moved up but Winky still a real good fighter at 170. He almost won, so he was still effective.

AntonTheMeh

Quote:

Originally Posted by TRUTH

but you know how theres people that say...tarver was weight drained, and the rest were fighters that moved up. I want to see how many of them are around.

that's tarver's problem.its not a cop out.just like it isn't for roy.why the hell would they put themselves in that position in the first place?tarver had the ring belt, that's what hop wanted, he should have made hop wait for it.till he was fine.

View Poll Results: Is Bernard Hopkins An All Time Great Fighter?
Yes. If your still denying it now, your just a hater...	83	93.26%
No. He only beat smaller fighters who moved up in weight!!!	6	6.74%
Voters: 89. You may not vote on this poll

Truth RJJ: Former P4P King Join Date: May 2004 Location: Connecticut Age: 26 Posts: 19,712 Blog Entries: 3 Rep Power: 8766 Points: 10,510,778.41 Bank: 4,432.05 Total Points: 10,515,210.46 Donate	Bernard Hopkins: All Time Great... I say yes obviously. I just want to see if there are still people that don't believe...

AntonTheMeh D'yer Mak'er bobsled team Join Date: Sep 2007 Posts: 19,951 Rep Power: 53 Points: 1,000,040,640.91 Bank: 4,264,052,055.07 Total Points: 5,264,092,695.98 Donate	this should be pretty obvious.

Pugilistic™ Robyn Rihanna Fenty Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Scotland Age: 21 Posts: 10,132 Blog Entries: 1 Rep Power: 29 Points: 1,000,319.65 Bank: 683,440,693,992.75 Total Points: 683,441,694,312.40 Donate	Of course.

Dan... Fredette About It Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Brisbane, Australia Age: 28 Posts: 12,367 Rep Power: 33 Points: 1,010,107,274.04 Bank: 2,087,557,663.65 Total Points: 3,097,664,937.68 Donate	I highly doubt anyone would argue against it, even prior to the Pavlik win.

WhoreUs Banned Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Whoreville Posts: 19,754 Rep Power: 0 Points: 88,720.62 Bank: 256,301.05 Total Points: 345,021.67 Donate	yes. his resume speaks for itself. i still voted no out of spite though. he's an atg. not one of the top ones. he's no ali or robinson but he's up there. higher than floyd. i know that much.

Xol Contender Join Date: Jun 2005 Age: 28 Posts: 245 Rep Power: 0 Points: 17,528.24 Bank: 0.00 Total Points: 17,528.24 Donate	I really don't see how the weight theory holds any water here. Didn't Pavlik come into the last Taylor fight at 169?