|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
| Boxing Champions | Boxing Schedule | Boxing Video | Boxing History | Pound For Pound | Lounge | The Wire | Audio | Arcade |
|
Undisputed Champion
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Finland
Posts: 14,321
Rep Power: 41
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I would favour Liston, he was at his best against fighters like Rocky. Marciano would come straight at him.
Liston was a good boxer but he was also a little slower and fought rather conservatively, which is why he didn't do great against movers. He did beat Eddie Machen, Folley and others but he was better when his opponent stood right in front of him, like Marciano would. It's true that Frazier, or rather Frazier's management, didn't want a fight with Liston because they felt he was not a favourable match-up and taking a risk against Liston who no one wanted to see in the title picture again didn't make any sense. Can't blame them after the 'show' Liston put on in the rematch against Ali.. A whole lot of other top contenders avoided him also... except Leotis Martin who fought a brilliant fight against a slowened down Liston, ending Liston's dreams of another world title shot. Unfortunately the fight ended Martin's career also. Nothing good came out of that fight, except the highlight reel KO. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rc_268cv1pI Liston beats up Willi Besmanoff http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pO6gqaQ5uC4 The slugfest against Cleveland Williams Last edited by TheManchine; 09-23-2008 at 04:49 AM. |
|
|
||
|
part time fighter
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Calabasas, Calif
Posts: 5,171
Rep Power: 18
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Originally Posted by Tunney
Marciano had a 67" reach. Liston had an 86" reach, unusually long arms for his height. But Rocky beat a lot of other big men - almost everyone he ever fought had a height and reach advantage. Rocky wins by KO. Quote:
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Statesville, NC
Posts: 18,899
Rep Power: 0
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
With all due respect, you can't blame a fighter for the era he fought in. Marciano did what he had to do. And Patterson was obviously overmatched, suffering two first round blow outs. I would say his previous loss to Ingo doesn't help your argument much either. Fact is, both Marciano and Liston were dominant during their particular period and both deserve to be considered amongst the greatest heavies. I will concede that many fans overblow Rocky's 49-0(44) and underrate Sonny because of his two losses to Ali. |
|
|
Undisputed Champion
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 9,455
Rep Power: 29
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Marciano gets too much flack on the boards.
That being said, I don't like his chances here. Liston is not just a bigger, rangier fighter. He had skills too. Terrific jab, very heavy and effective left hook and straight right, nice body attack. Not just a big puncher, but an effective boxer as well. I think Liston takes this. |
|
Contender
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 364
Rep Power: 5
![]() |
Come to think of it, I wonder what the gameplan of a prime Jersey Joe Walcott would have been against Liston.Would it have been similar to his first Louis fight:be elusive,don't let him corner you and if you're on the ropes set traps for him? Personally, I think that the Liston would have been a far better match-up for Walcott than Marciano. In fact Ali took some of Walcott's moves. So it's not an unreasonable assumption to make
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| liston, marciano |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Privacy Policy - Submit
News - Feedback
- Site Map - Advertise
with Us
Copyright © 2003-2013 BoxingScene LLC All rights reserved.