Pacquiao will be remembered as a greater fighter than Mayweather

[Marvellous1]

Originally Posted by PAC-BOY

Ask Bhop...hes 46 and still going. Oh and the hype is 40 is the new 30 by the way! heheheheeeee One puch can change a fight. You dont have to be 20 or so to throw a punch...thats you ignorance to the sport and conditioning . I dont mind at all helping the less fortunate... i know youre a little slow so ill help you! Sorry you failed at a logical point!

Translate: "I STILL don't have an answer to your question".

Trying to appear clever with your pseudo-superiority rather than just answering a question is really poor show. I'll try again.

Do you think Marquez was genuinely at his best (ie. peak, prime) in his last fight with Pacquiao? That is what you alluded to when saying, "that's what happens when fighters face each other at their best". That would imply that not only was Marquez at his best at nearly 40, but so too was Pacquiao. Did Pacquiao just get knocked out at his best? I'll see if you can actually answer these questions like a man or try to pretend to be clever (and fail).

[Ringlife]

Yeah, I agree with that. I guess 315 voters have common sense.

[Davis40]

lots of salty flowmos in this thread. They were so happy last month thinking they won some kind of victory.

[hugh grant]

Originally Posted by Marvellous1

Translate: "I STILL don't have an answer to your question".

Trying to appear clever with your pseudo-superiority rather than just answering a question is really poor show. I'll try again.

Do you think Marquez was genuinely at his best (ie. peak, prime) in his last fight with Pacquiao? That is what you alluded to when saying, "that's what happens when fighters face each other at their best". That would imply that not only was Marquez at his best at nearly 40, but so too was Pacquiao. Did Pacquiao just get knocked out at his best? I'll see if you can actually answer these questions like a man or try to pretend to be clever (and fail).

Pac wasnt at his best, he has had too many tough fights, unlike JMM. And style wise it was a bad match up for Pac, but he was still ahead on points against the best counterpuncher in the world. So what does that say about Pac.......lots?

It doesnt matter that Pac lost. People who fight often and against great fighters lose, unlike Floyd who dont fight often and dont fight great fighters often.
Its important that to become great you challenge yourself often, losing doesnt matter, because great fighters lose. The incentive is to fight and not try keeping the zeros. The benefit of the doubt goes to the one who fights, losing isnt the important issue. Its the fact that you fight great fighters often. No one is going to hold it against Pac he got ko'ed in the fourth fight with JMM.
Cos anyone can say Floyd would also get ko'ed by JMM if he fought JMM at least 2 times, and if not 2 times, he would get koed in the third fight and no one can prove otherwise.

[littlemac]

Manny will be remembered as the hype job that got knocked the phuck out by a 40 year old light weight he tried to cherry pick by making the light weight move up.

[josenoway]

In light of Barry Bonds, Clemens and others being denied entrance to the HOF and now Lance Armstrong confessing, Nappiao will be remembered for refusing to be drug tested using classic excuses as 'Scared of needles' and 'Superstitious' and 'I need cutoffs.'

Getting Zero Dark Thirty'd by JMM is just the cherry on the top.