Marquez clearly lost, and Marquez is a sore, whining loser along with people who keep starting these garbage threads. Bradley continues to be disrespected and it's getting old.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
If you thought Broner beat Paulie, shouldn't you think Marquez beat Bradley?
Collapse
-
Stop these lame ass threads, Marquez is the most overrated fighter of modern times, bitter midget made his name piggybacking off the fact that he gave Pacquiao a series of competitive fights.... sore loser.
Comment
-
bad comparison. neither fight was close anyways, broner clearly beat malignaggi and bradley clearly beat marquez. JMM wasnt landing better shots early, bradley was landing better punches and more off them. as was broner, great defense on top of that for both.
Comment
-
Very bad comparison; if one was to ask me. While it's true that according to the Compubox Punchstats, Paulie Malignaggi was indeed the busier of the two fighters but at the same time, Adrien Broner was the more accurate and landed more also.
On the other hand with the Bradley-Marquez bout, the Compubox Punchstats were the total opposite. Timothy not only out landed Marquez but at the same time was the more active of the two as well by out hustling him by more than a hundred punches. So that argument right there is somewhat flawed.
Overall, Timothy put on a much more dominating performance against JMM than either Paulie or Adrien in their bout.
Comment
-
Originally posted by KeepItObjective View PostStop these lame ass threads, Marquez is the most overrated fighter of modern times, bitter midget made his name piggybacking off the fact that he gave Pacquiao a series of competitive fights.... sore loser.
Comment
Comment