both great wins.both earned the victories at young ages over "THE MAN"in the division
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Better win for first title: Mayweather or Pacquiao
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by DempseyRollin View PostSo we've seen the fights we know the stories, who's first title win was more impressive.
Floyd vs. Hernandez or Manny vs. Sasakul?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Walt Liquor View Postprobably the worst thread ever..............................
duh
so an olympic gold medalist who had everything handed to him (as far as getting fights and exposure goes) had a better first title win than an obscure asian fighter with no amateur career worth mentioning. wow, that means a lot.
Comment
-
manny's. lineal title>>>>>>regular title
sasakul just beat a p4p fighter when he lost to pac. genaro (altho better than sasajul overall) was at his last leg of his carreer.
Comment
-
-
-
To set the record straight. Yes Pacquiao-Sasakul was for the lineal title. Sasakul was the lineal champion. But, So what Mayweather-Hernandez...Going into the fight Hernandez was the lineal champion.
So while anyone wants to give credit to Pac for getting that lineal championship. That same credit needs to be given to Floyd for getting that lineal champion.
By no means was Floyd-Hernandez a "regular title".
Carry on with the debate.
Comment
-
Originally posted by PED User View PostI honestly have never seen another Sasakul fight to really compare.
Sasakul also went 1-1 with Yuri Arbachakov who was a good Flyweight during the 90's. Was borderline elite level fighter in the 90's. Was in some P4P list. Sasakul had beaten Arbachakov going into the Pac fight.
Comment
-
Originally posted by PED User View PostI honestly have never seen another Sasakul fight to really compare.
Comment
-
Originally posted by PED User View PostI honestly have never seen another Sasakul fight to really compare.
Floyd defeated Hernandez in 1998 ans still hasn't lost 14 years later.....
Comment
Comment