Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Black Sheriff destroys BLM and Don Lemon

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11


    and who is george soros???



    and to understand the bankers heres this vid:


    a different vid about the bankers:

    Comment


    • #12
      lol I'm sure this cop didn't have his own agenda, not at all. He talked at the RNC for crying out loud

      Cops like this are the epitome of why there's so much anti police rhetoric in the first place. Wtf was he trying to accomplish getting all tough with the CNN anchorman in the first place? Right, he had an agenda he wanted to get across from the get go.

      Comment


      • #13
        Originally posted by Paulie Walnuts View Post
        "Research from Washington post shows black people are twice as likely to get shot by police officers."

        "Harvard study shows there's no difference, but found blacks are more likely to suffer aggressive policing."


        Which study are you going to back Lemon? You can't back both because they contradict each other.
        Those two sentences do not contradict each other at all.

        Blacks are more likely to be involved in all sorts of police altercations because they have by far the highest crime rates of any ethnic group.

        The Harvard study concludes that on a ratio basis, the police don't show racial bias in the use of lethal force.

        What's the contradiction?

        Is it now the fault of the police that blacks have higher crime rates to begin with? Oh I see...

        Comment


        • #14
          Originally posted by ИATAS View Post
          lol I'm sure this cop didn't have his own agenda, not at all. He talked at the RNC for crying out loud

          Cops like this are the epitome of why there's so much anti police rhetoric in the first place. Wtf was he trying to accomplish getting all tough with the CNN anchorman in the first place? Right, he had an agenda he wanted to get across from the get go.
          and you dont have an agenda mr. grass roots che guevara i raised minimum wage to $15 socialist (lol you dont even know the consequences of your actions)?

          yea, he has an agenda,

          to stop people from killing innocent cops.

          smdh...

          you on the other hand, defend BLM.

          you're on the wrong side of history.

          Comment


          • #15
            Originally posted by Sterling Archer View Post
            and you dont have an agenda mr. grass roots che guevara i raised minimum wage to $15 socialist (lol you dont even know the consequences of your actions)?

            yea, he has an agenda,

            to stop people from killing innocent cops.

            smdh...

            you on the other hand, defend BLM.

            you're on the wrong side of history.

            Oh shit look it's Streling Faggot saying something stupid again, how shocking!

            Comment


            • #16
              Originally posted by //// View Post
              Those two sentences do not contradict each other at all.

              Blacks are more likely to be involved in all sorts of police altercations because they have by far the highest crime rates of any ethnic group.

              The Harvard study concludes that on a ratio basis, the police don't show racial bias in the use of lethal force.

              What's the contradiction?

              Is it now the fault of the police that blacks have higher crime rates to begin with? Oh I see...
              The Harvard study shows there's no difference between black and white people getting shot by police. The Washington post says blacks are twice as likely.

              Comment


              • #17
                Originally posted by Paulie Walnuts View Post
                The Harvard study shows there's no difference between black and white people getting shot by police. The Washington post says blacks are twice as likely.
                There is no contradiction that I can see from the sentences you typed.

                Blacks are more likely to have every time of altercation with police, including being shot, because their crime rates and total police encounter rates are much higher.

                However on a per-encounter they are actually less likely to be shot by police than whites are.

                What is the contradiction?

                In theory whites and hispanics should be the ones protesting against black crime since they are disproportionately the victims of interracial killings but this isn't about statistics, it's about culture and fashion.
                Last edited by ////; 07-20-2016, 12:43 PM.

                Comment


                • #18
                  Originally posted by ИATAS View Post
                  Oh shit look it's Streling Faggot saying something stupid again, how shocking!
                  you're proud of forcing the government to force a minimum wage hike?

                  and im saying something stupid?

                  why did you settle at the number 15?

                  why not 16 per hr? 20 per hr?

                  what economic basis do you have for selecting 15 per hr?

                  educate me. professor libtard....

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Originally posted by Sterling Archer View Post
                    you're proud of forcing the government to force a minimum wage hike?

                    and im saying something stupid?

                    why did you settle at the number 15?

                    why not 16 per hr? 20 per hr?

                    what economic basis do you have for selecting 15 per hr?

                    educate me. professor libtard....
                    Take your ADHD meds god damn, stick to the topic.

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Originally posted by //// View Post
                      There is no contradiction that I can see from the sentences you typed.

                      Blacks are more likely to have every time of altercation with police, including being shot, because their crime rates and total police encounter rates are much higher.

                      However on a per-encounter they are actually less likely to be shot by police than whites are.

                      What is the contradiction?

                      In theory whites and hispanics should be the ones protesting against black crime since they are disproportionately the victims of interracial killings but this isn't about statistics, it's about culture and fashion.
                      ding ding ding ding!!!!

                      showing stats is not enough anymore these days.

                      you have to baby and explain to them the answers.

                      you provide them with more than just stats like a personal analytical take on why there is such a problem in the black community like i did with the fathers thread, you get called a racist.

                      stats?

                      racist

                      explanation of stats?

                      racist

                      non statistical analytical theory?

                      racist

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP