lol I'm sure this cop didn't have his own agenda, not at all. He talked at the RNC for crying out loud
Cops like this are the epitome of why there's so much anti police rhetoric in the first place. Wtf was he trying to accomplish getting all tough with the CNN anchorman in the first place? Right, he had an agenda he wanted to get across from the get go.
lol I'm sure this cop didn't have his own agenda, not at all. He talked at the RNC for crying out loud
Cops like this are the epitome of why there's so much anti police rhetoric in the first place. Wtf was he trying to accomplish getting all tough with the CNN anchorman in the first place? Right, he had an agenda he wanted to get across from the get go.
and you dont have an agenda mr. grass roots che guevara i raised minimum wage to $15 socialist (lol you dont even know the consequences of your actions)?
and you dont have an agenda mr. grass roots che guevara i raised minimum wage to $15 socialist (lol you dont even know the consequences of your actions)?
Those two sentences do not contradict each other at all.
Blacks are more likely to be involved in all sorts of police altercations because they have by far the highest crime rates of any ethnic group.
The Harvard study concludes that on a ratio basis, the police don't show racial bias in the use of lethal force.
What's the contradiction?
Is it now the fault of the police that blacks have higher crime rates to begin with? Oh I see...
The Harvard study shows there's no difference between black and white people getting shot by police. The Washington post says blacks are twice as likely.
The Harvard study shows there's no difference between black and white people getting shot by police. The Washington post says blacks are twice as likely.
There is no contradiction that I can see from the sentences you typed.
Blacks are more likely to have every time of altercation with police, including being shot, because their crime rates and total police encounter rates are much higher.
However on a per-encounter they are actually less likely to be shot by police than whites are.
What is the contradiction?
In theory whites and hispanics should be the ones protesting against black crime since they are disproportionately the victims of interracial killings but this isn't about statistics, it's about culture and fashion.
There is no contradiction that I can see from the sentences you typed.
Blacks are more likely to have every time of altercation with police, including being shot, because their crime rates and total police encounter rates are much higher.
However on a per-encounter they are actually less likely to be shot by police than whites are.
What is the contradiction?
In theory whites and hispanics should be the ones protesting against black crime since they are disproportionately the victims of interracial killings but this isn't about statistics, it's about culture and fashion.
ding ding ding ding!!!!
showing stats is not enough anymore these days.
you have to baby and explain to them the answers.
you provide them with more than just stats like a personal analytical take on why there is such a problem in the black community like i did with the fathers thread, you get called a racist.
Comment