Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Who here wants to see a roided up Pacquiao vs Mayweather?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    Originally posted by Einstien View Post
    "Blood screening is more sensitive (more likely to detect a banned substance), detects more banned substances, and is more difficult to beat through "masking" methods. Blood screening is the current standard for detecting abnormally elevated levels of synthetic human growth hormone (HGH)".

    http://mmajunkie.com/news/16045/ask-...urine-best.mma

    FAIL!!!!
    I'm in for this ramdom blood testing but which one? You mean the all year round testing or Floyd invented just two months OST? Then what is he gonna do for another 10 months? He could be roiding right now you know? That is why I'm saying this all the time. This Floyd invented OST is useless! If he really wants his fight to be cleaned then go for all year round testing like the Olympic athletes did and subjected himself into this like they did. Other than that I see it as ducking Pac. Floyd road blocks leading to this fight.... 2 months useless OST, 60-40 money split in his favor, 1-2 years retirement which currently doing right now. We never see this fight honestly and blaming it to Pac is completely absurd.
    Last edited by whirlwind; 06-21-2010, 09:28 PM.

    Comment


    • #42
      Originally posted by Boss2k10 View Post
      Lets be honest the only way Pacquiao beats Mayweather is if the same beast who destroyed DLH,Hatton, Diaz Clottey and Cotto shows up.

      if we get the Pac who aint on roids then we get the guy that was outboxed by JMM. Mayweather is a lot better counterpuncher so this fight is not going to be competitive it will be a one sided fight with people booing and leaving early.

      This roided up Pac is the only fighter who Mayweather can possibly face that will challenge him.

      That is why OSDT should not be used as this will severely weaken Pac meaning we dont get a competitive fight.

      That is why I want to see a roided up Pac take on Mayweather. With Roids Pac is able to take punches extremely well, see the Cotto fight where he doesnt even flinch when Cotto lands his best, compare this to the guy rocked by JMM. It dont matter how much Mayweather counters him, Pac will keep coming forward like Philipine solidiers who keep coming forward when they were shot.
      You asked us to be honest but are you being honest yourself? Where's your proof Pac was on roids?

      Comment


      • #43
        Originally posted by LARRYX P4P#1 View Post
        why do you have **** like this saved to your pc??
        because it's funny.

        Comment


        • #44
          Originally posted by Einstien View Post
          "Blood screening is more sensitive (more likely to detect a banned substance), detects more banned substances, and is more difficult to beat through "masking" methods. Blood screening is the current standard for detecting abnormally elevated levels of synthetic human growth hormone (HGH)".

          http://mmajunkie.com/news/16045/ask-...urine-best.mma

          FAIL!!!!
          Read em and weep.

          Link

          Drs. Caitlin, Sonksen and Yesalis are not advocates for abuse of drugs in sport. To the contrary, they are respected researchers who have done much to attempt to eliminate performance enhancing drugs in sport. Dr. Caitlin heads the most respected drug testing laboratory in the United States and developed the test which broke the Balco scandal. Dr. Sonksen is a fellow of the Royal Society of Physicians with some 315 scientific publications, many on this very topic. Dr. Yesalis co-authored the first comprehensive surveys of teen steroid use.

          Caitlin, Sonksen, and others are working on legitimate, more reliable tests for HGH. While it may appear politically correct and provide a good “sound bite” to jump on the bandwagon for drug-free sports, the truth is that the blood testing suggested for HGH is, at best, limited and impractical and at worst scientifically suspect. Efforts should be toward developing tests that work and then implementing them; not in pretending that there are good and generally accepted scientifically valid testing techniques when there are not.
          Notice the doctor that's actually mentioned in the article. The same one who busted the BALCO case.

          This isn't even the article I was looking for, but I found this one to be better. There is also another article that someone here on boxingscene posted a while ago about a New York based doctor who said that urine tests were in fact superior to blood testing, because of the fact that no "known" drug could pass the kidney without being detected.

          Comment


          • #45
            Originally posted by Boss2k10 View Post
            Lets be honest the only way Pacquiao beats Mayweather is if the same beast who destroyed DLH,Hatton, Diaz Clottey and Cotto shows up.

            if we get the Pac who aint on roids then we get the guy that was outboxed by JMM. Mayweather is a lot better counterpuncher so this fight is not going to be competitive it will be a one sided fight with people booing and leaving early.

            This roided up Pac is the only fighter who Mayweather can possibly face that will challenge him.

            That is why OSDT should not be used as this will severely weaken Pac meaning we dont get a competitive fight.

            That is why I want to see a roided up Pac take on Mayweather. With Roids Pac is able to take punches extremely well, see the Cotto fight where he doesnt even flinch when Cotto lands his best, compare this to the guy rocked by JMM. It dont matter how much Mayweather counters him, Pac will keep coming forward like Philipine solidiers who keep coming forward when they were shot.
            you *******....... no doubt you are one of the no brainer dickhead gayweather follower.... you judge already PAC....

            Comment

            Working...
            X
            TOP