Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Paul Williams vs Mark Breland

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Paul Williams vs Mark Breland

    Breland was a 6'2", hard hitting, agile WW with a great jab and excellent boxing ability. Had his chin been a bit better, he might've been almost unbeatable. How do you think he would've matched up with Paul Williams?

  • #2
    i think it would have been a very good fight. not sure of the winner, but would have loved to seen it.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by MELLY-MEL... View Post
      i think it would have been a very good fight. not sure of the winner, but would have loved to seen it.
      Williams is a better inside fighter and looks like he has a better chin, while Breland fights taller, has a wicked jab and is a better boxer.

      Comment


      • #4
        It would've been a good fight. Williams is probably the only welterweight ever, that doesn't physically look up to Breland.

        If Breland could keep it at long range behind his fantastic jab, i'd take him to win a UD. But it'd be close.

        Comment


        • #5
          Breland used to be a tremendous puncher and Williams isnt the slickest guy out there.

          PW would have no advantage in this match up, Breland would KO him

          Comment


          • #6
            I dunno, I haven't seen heaps of Breland but from what I have seen I was not overly impressed with him.

            Comment


            • #7
              I take Williams and his work rate by decision.

              Hearns knocks both out.

              Comment

              Working...
              X
              TOP