Gamblers Advisory "Pac the G.O.A.T YOU'VE GOT TO BE KIDDING!

[NakiFan]

Interesting watch, he goes on to say that basically Hatton was a very poor fighter, who telegraphed his punches, had no defense and was wide open, he says that true greats like ali etc got hit less in entire fights than Pac did in the first round. He says PBF hit's harder than manny nad other interesting things, anyway take a look.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZjP_n...e=channel_page

[cosmichorn]

good video, pretty cynical approach though, but manny isnt the best ever....yet

[iron lung]

very interesting. Dwyer at gamblersadvisory is a legend, he has the highest prediction ratio for big fights most people have ever seen. He's a legend on the internet throughout all boxing forums and respected by everyone from here to e-a-s-t-sideboxing etc.
So I respect everything he says. It's interesting that he says Mayweather has more power than Pacman and that Floyd will beat Pacquiao.
He feels that Marquez beat Pacquiao.

The most interesting and true things he says is how Roach trained Oscar and knew that Oscar was actually a lefty-southpaw convert. Everyone knows that the way to beat a southpaw is with a straight right. Well Oscar famously has no straight right because since he's a lefty fighting in the orthodox stance, his "power" hand is his jab and left hook hand and thus he didnt' have the weapon to beat Pacquiao plus the fact that he was weight drained as ****. Same thing goes for Hatton, he has no straight right and so was tailor made for Pacquiao.
I think Dwyer showed a tad bias and went a little bit over board in hinting that Hatton began to dominate Pacman in the 2nd round. He seems to be defensive over a Filippino fighter beating out other black fighters for p4p atg, which is why he harped so long on how SRR, SRL, Ali etc are all better than Pacquiao so thus tinging his report with a little hint of racial bias. But either way the things he said were mostly dead on and true and he does have the highest predictive percentage most people have ever seen, he even picked Pacquiao by KO over Hatton I believe so take it for what it's worth.

[Pullcounter]

he makes some good points but......

- championship titles in 6 divisions
- 4 lineal championships
- beat morales 2x
- beat mab 2x
- beat jmm 2x
- beat dlh
- beat hatton
- moved up from 106 to 147

[Kball15]

Pacquiaos career speaks for itself.

Greats like Aaron Pryor, Alexis Arguello, Joe Louis, Muhammad Ali, all did MANY things incorrectly, that doesnt mean they are any less great.

And who gives a **** how often Pacquiao got hit. It was UBUNDANTLY clear after a minute that nothing Hatton was doing was gonna be effective, so pacquiao left himself open to get his shots off.

Pacquioa was barely hit AT ALL in his fights against DLH and DIAZ. The guy speakin is a clown

[-Antonio-]

Pacquiao knocked Hatton out with a looping left hand, or left hook from the southpaw stance. Not a straight left.

Pacquiao landed plenty of punches in the 2nd round. Hatton landed two good punches. You cant expect Pac to go untouched. That's ridiculous. "Not as one sided ad the comentators would lead you to believe." It was a 2 round demolition. What is he talking about?

Mayweather had power at 130 that you've never seen Pacquiao have? What?

I agree with the fact that Pac has more touble with right handed fighters (Morales, Marquez)

[Pullcounter]

if you're as offensive minded as pac, you're boound to get hit.

[deanrw]

He also predicted that Hatton would beat Manny...

well that is wrong. lately is he is telling everyone lately to straddle their bets.