Originally posted by Slip Stream
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Mayweather's IV injection (Master thread)
Collapse
-
Originally posted by GTTofAK View PostNo its called hand eye coordination, something PEDs are proven to improve.
Comment
-
Originally posted by SugarKaineHook View PostYou still don't understand
Its titled "Can Boxing Trust USADA"
Hauser puts forward a pattern of behavior where USADA hides information for those who pay them. The Morales case is the most clear cut case we have as it has long since played out.
Your entire argument is based on the bleif that USADA is being truthful and forthright in their response to Hauser. Unfortunately, for you USADA lied in the Morales case to the NSAC and the press. No wonder you dont like people talking about how USADA lied about Morales. It destroyed your entire argument. Well you can just go **** yourself then you stupid piece of ****. You cant use USADA as a trustworthy source they have no credibility.
Look at their own words. They go to great lengths in their response not to commit lies of commission but it is full of lies of omission and context.
On that October 17th, phone call with the NSAC do you think they just forgot to mention the 2 previous A and B samples that tested positive? No. They were lying by omission. They were hoping that the only thing that had been leaked to the press was the one positive A sample test. They were wrong and got caught in a lie.Last edited by GTTofAK; 10-05-2015, 02:00 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Slip Stream View PostI'm sure there are lots of boxers that have used PEDs, but I have yet to see any of them have near the skill that Floyd has.Last edited by GTTofAK; 10-05-2015, 04:53 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Slip Stream View PostA lesson in "defense?" How'd Manny do that, by blocking Mayweather's punches with his head?
Comment
-
Originally posted by GTTofAK View PostNo you dont ****ing understand. Hausers article was not titled Mayweather USED PEDs.
Its titled "Can Boxing Trust USADA"
Hauser puts forward a pattern of behavior where USADA hides information for those who pay them. The Morales case is the most clear cut case we have as it has long since played out.
Your entire argument is based on the bleif that USADA is being truthful and forthright in their response to Hauser. Unfortunately, for you USADA lied in the Morales case to the NSAC and the press. No wonder you dont like people talking about how USADA lied about Morales. It destroyed your entire argument. Well you can just go **** yourself then you stupid piece of ****. You cant use USADA as a trustworthy source they have no credibility.
Look at their own words. They go to great lengths in their response not to commit lies of commission but it is full of lies of omission and context.
On that October 17th, phone call with the NSAC do you think they just forgot to mention the 2 previous A and B samples that tested positive? No. They were lying by omission. They were hoping that the only thing that had been leaked to the press was the one positive A sample test. They were wrong and got caught in a lie.
Stop bringing up Barry Bonds. Only an idiot revisits a different sport and not once mention BALCO or Victor Conte. facepalm
Comment
-
Originally posted by GTTofAK View PostNever saw a baseball player who could make contact as well as Bonds. .370 when ever team is trying to pitch around you. That is unreal.
Originally posted by ModernTalking View PostBy slipping with head movement and countering Froid in the process. The only shots Froid landed were the ones the commentators were yapping about which is none.
Comment
-
Originally posted by SugarKaineHook View PostI see, ''the pattern'' of information they hid. So you're agreeing that Floyd had no wrong doing
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by GTTofAK View PostIt takes two to tango. When someone is being paid to hide evidence and does so there are two guilty parties. The one who does the hiding and the one who paid them to do it.
Comment
Comment