Po-PEDkin is just making it worse for himself. He tested negative and positive after the drug was put on the banned list. what a idiot
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Wilder's Attorney: Povetkin Lawsuit is Absured, Just Don't Dope
Collapse
-
Originally posted by bigjavi973 View Postya PEDvetkin supporters are laughable....
PEDvetkin couldn't even stop a CRUISERWEIGHT marco huck... all of a sudden after the wlad loss he's ko'ing dudes
he was taking that stuff.
Comment
-
Originally posted by //// View PostAll evidence suggests he did not dope though. So every time they tell the media that he did they make the lawsuit more potent.
A court wouln't function like boxingscene:
Judge: So you tested positive for meldonium?
Povetkin: Yes, 70 nanograms, an exempt microtrace within error margins according to WADA. I tested clean immediately before and after and the test results could not be replicated, no could a dosage be administered and reduced within that time frame given that meldonium is notoriously difficult to flush or mask.
Judge: MELDRONROID? YOU A DOPER WHITEBOY!!! RED K!!!
Lou Dibella: 8000000 zilligrams, dirty! Fight cancelled!
WBC: Actually never cancelled the fight or ruled that Povetkin violated any r-
Jury: SHUT DA **** UP BORDER HOPPER RED K!!
Judge: The court hasn't read the rules but finds you guilty coz it was on twitter red k
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ake-Dawg View PostHe has to sue to get his training camp money back. He paid for sparring partners, training facilities in the UK, and lodging for his team in the UK as well.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Rip Chudd View PostI have no idea why you went on that rant, but the facts are he tested positive, the fight was post poned. If Wilder and his team want to cancel it then that's on them, they can do so by dropping the belt because that seems to be the only way it gets officially canceled. Truth is the fight would of happened had Povetkin not tested clean 3 times then all of a sudden come up with a dirty sample
Wilder's camp's insistence on calling him dity and blaming the (nonexistent) cancellation on him could result in financial punishment.
Povetkin has admitted he was taking meldonium when it was completely legal. That stray detection (sandwiched between two clean tests) was consistent with the microtraces the drug is known to leave and way too low to indicate recent doping.
It's basically a mistake in any situation to make premature accusations with millions of dollars at stake. You become liable for them.Last edited by ////; 06-23-2016, 06:07 PM.
Comment
-
That's what you have to do to get this guy to fight someone who actually has a chance of beating him. I hope Povetkin wins the suit.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Rip Chudd View Postyou can't make this up. I dope, get the fight called off because of a positive test, then sue you
Tests positive but has the nerves to sue and then say Wilder started a "smear campaign." What smear? You tested positive. You smeared yourself.
Originally posted by //// View PostAll evidence suggests he did not dope though. So every time they tell the media that he did they make the lawsuit more potent.
A court wouln't function like boxingscene:
Judge: So you tested positive for meldonium?
Povetkin: Yes, 70 nanograms, an exempt microtrace within error margins according to WADA. I tested clean immediately before and after and the test results could not be replicated, no could a dosage be administered and reduced within that time frame given that meldonium is notoriously difficult to flush or mask.
Judge: MELDRONROID? YOU A DOPER WHITEBOY!!! RED K!!!
Lou Dibella: 8000000 zilligrams, dirty! Fight cancelled!
WBC: Actually never cancelled the fight or ruled that Povetkin violated any r-
Jury: SHUT DA **** UP BORDER HOPPER RED K!!
Judge: The court hasn't read the rules but finds you guilty coz it was on twitter red kOriginally posted by //// View PostThose "facts" would not be accepted in any court room though. They would read the rules and examine the thresholds and error margins of meldonium and find that Povetkin's tests are not indicative of anything illegal. Lou DiBella tweets would not serve as evidence.
Wilder's camp's insistence on calling him dity and blaming the (nonexistent) cancellation on him could result in financial punishment.
Povetkin has admitted he was taking meldonium when it was completely legal. That stray detection (sandwiched between two clean tests) was consistent with the microtraces the drug is known to leave and way too low to indicate recent oping.
The dude tested positive. End of.
Comment
-
Originally posted by .:: JSFD26 ::. View PostI came in here to say something similar.
Tests positive but has the nerves to sue and then say Wilder started a "smear campaign." What smear? You tested positive. You smeared yourself.
Oh look, one of the many know-it-all's in BScene. A lawyer/judge/juror.
The dude tested positive. End of.
Sometimes welfare is a good thing because it prevents people from making important decisions.
Comment
Comment