Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Who has the better Resume?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by blackirish137 View Post
    hmm...debatable. Hopkins was pretty unproven. and although like you said a lot of them were out the door or changing divisions, guys like Toney, McCallum, Jackson, Kalambay, McClellan, and Johnson deserved to be above Hopkins at that present time.

    regardless, the Hopkins win was very good, but he flat out was not prime.
    Neither was Jones.

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by IMDAZED View Post
      What he said.
      What he said he said.

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by jrosales13 View Post
        So why are you assuming that I'm talking about the first fight?
        Cuz' I tend to think in chronological order.

        Fraud won the second fight, and there should've been a rubbermatch imo.

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by IMDAZED View Post
          Neither was Jones.
          being not prime yourself doesnt make the other guy prime magically.

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by blackirish137 View Post
            being not prime yourself doesnt make the other guy prime magically.
            I never said he was.

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by blackirish137 View Post
              maybe by an alphabet belt, which means little since their records are terrible and also they flat out ignore the existance of the belts' champions. In reality, he was around 9th in the division.

              good win, but Hopkins was not prime, and Roy being slightly not prime doesnt change that.
              It was the IBF ranking. Roy was probably less experience that Hopkins.

              Hopkins also decided to stay away from Roy during his prime years. Roy offered him 60/40 but Hopkins would not accept.

              Hopkins just feasted on blown up light-middles and welters when RJJ was moving up through the weights to heavy beating some great fighters along the way and putting on some great shows.

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by IMDAZED View Post
                Neither was Jones.
                He had more of a pedigree.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK View Post
                  He had more of a pedigree.
                  Yes he did.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    I actually might favour Mayweather on this one.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by IMDAZED View Post
                      I never said he was.
                      then we agree Hopkins was not prime when Roy beat him, although Roy had about a year to go before turning prime himself. excellent.
                      It was the IBF ranking. Roy was probably less experience that Hopkins.

                      Hopkins also decided to stay away from Roy during his prime years. Roy offered him 60/40 but Hopkins would not accept.

                      Hopkins just feasted on blown up light-middles and welters when RJJ was moving up through the weights to heavy beating some great fighters along the way and putting on some great shows.
                      irrelevant. fact is Roy never beat a prime Hopkins, so Im not going to give him credit for a win over a prime Hopkins, even though it was a solid win. its as simple as that.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP