Originally posted by Strategic1
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Pacquiao on the c side of his career?
Collapse
-
Originally posted by MrP4P View PostDo I know you? where did I say I hate pacquaio? You guys are didnt even realize the poster who responded to me started the WHAT IF game so I answered his question, you guys read one post and go on and on without even looking back at what started the conversation. If I dont think bradley was THAT high on the P4P list because he truly lost to Pacquiao thats my opinion, you guys look silly trying to convince me otherwise because P4P is subjective and he wasnt that high on my list.
Attacking other posters like that,... and the basis of your argument... It just seemed typical hater crap.
So if I was wrong...SORRY.
You just sounded childish to me.
Comment
-
Originally posted by MrP4P View PostAmir Khan, Shawn Porter, Keith Thurman, Marcos Maidana, heck even Guerrero has a chance against Bradley. The buck doesnt stop at Top Rank, people forget theres other welterweights.
Either way, none of those guys you listed have a win comparable to Bradley's win over another P4P fighter.
That's how it works. You beat another P4P fighter who's coming off a hyped win over another P4P fighter... then you get ranked high. Simple.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Strategic1 View PostOk maybe you don't hate PAC. I just figured the way you talk (type) , you sound childish. Making counter attacks calling people worshippers.." you can't even read".... calling people "lame".
Attacking other posters like that,... and the basis of your argument... It just seemed typical hater crap.
So if I was wrong...SORRY.
You just sounded childish to me.Last edited by MrP4P; 07-17-2014, 10:14 AM.
Comment
-
Martinez and Ward are in different weight classes obviously. Though Ward and Bradley fought in the amateurs.
The Bradley that fought PAC the first 5 rounds in PAC-Bradley 2 is tough to beat. He fought stupid in the 2nd half (last 6-7 rounds of the fight) PAC did make adjustments which Bradley acknowledged. And Bradley got injured. I'm not sure which played a bigger role.
Based on what we seen from Bradley against JMM and that first 5 rounds against PAC, ...I'd favor him over any other welter. He hasn't been knocked out before so you'd have to outbox Bradley to win.
It's just a matter of Bradley staying disciplined and staying mentally in it. If he's disciplined (as he was a full 12 rounds with JMM), IMO he beats those welters you mentioned (Amir, Porter, Thurman, Guerrero)
Comment
-
Originally posted by Strategic1 View PostMartinez and Ward are in different weight classes obviously. Though Ward and Bradley fought in the amateurs.
The Bradley that fought PAC the first 5 rounds in PAC-Bradley 2 is tough to beat. He fought stupid in the 2nd half (last 6-7 rounds of the fight) PAC did make adjustments which Bradley acknowledged. And Bradley got injured. I'm not sure which played a bigger role.
Based on what we seen from Bradley against JMM and that first 5 rounds against PAC, ...I'd favor him over any other welter. He hasn't been knocked out before so you'd have to outbox Bradley to win.
It's just a matter of Bradley staying disciplined and staying mentally in it. If he's disciplined (as he was a full 12 rounds with JMM), IMO he beats those welters you mentioned (Amir, Porter, Thurman, Guerrero)Last edited by MrP4P; 07-17-2014, 10:54 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by MrP4P View PostWell you think more highly of Bradley than I do so ofcourse you wont agree since you legitimately believe hes the 3rd best welterweight(even though I disagree) however most just say it to add to Pacquiaos win. I dont think he beats Khan IMO because Khan relies on SPEED while Pacquiao used his boxing ability plus speed to bother Bradley, and you even mention that speed is what did Bradley in. Bradley is tough, I wont argue that, Ward still says that was his toughest fight even though they were like 14 years old. My whole argument was that Pound for Pound was made to rate fighters that were in different weight classes head to head by skill and some mention to resume and popularity, and Bradley wasnt that high on my list compare to Martinez, Ward, Mayweather, Pacquiao, Rigo, Wlad and others. The same people who claim bradley was legit top 3 are the same ones who bashed him saying Ruslan beat him and got robbed prior to the Pacquiao rematch then use that win to justify his P4P ranking after the Pacquiao rematch.. alot of people flip flop and thats fact, not opinion.
We can debate this all we want. But we wouldn't know anything for sure until these guys face each other.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Strategic1 View PostBradley-Khan would be a good matchup. Damn, hope this cold war BS ends soon.
We can debate this all we want. But we wouldn't know anything for sure until these guys face each other.
Comment
-
Originally posted by MrP4P View PostIf we look at it that wyay you have to consider that Marquez ONLY fought Bradley because Bradley had the welterwight title and Marquez was chasing the 5th title in 5 divisions, he would have won it from Pacquiao if Pacquiao didnt get robbed in the first Bradley fight so Maqruez Bradley would have never happened, That robbery altered the P4P list. I cant act like Bradley was really that good, so if he lost to Pacquiao, never fought marquez and then fought Ruslan who was fresh off of ESPN firday night fights... Bradley doesnt even sniff top 10 P4P.
Comment
Comment