Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

PBC has TONS of money in the bank

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Motofan View Post
    "Investors in the Waddell & Reed fund bankrolling PBC are suing Waddell & Reed for $925 million."

    OLATHE, Kan. (CN) — Kansas-based business trusts let a portfolio manager spend $925 million on a "potentially criminal" start-up pro boxing company rather than the stable investments they advertised, shareholders claim in court.

    Saket Kapor and two others sued Ivy Investment Management Co. and Waddell & Reed Investment Co. on April 18 in Johnson County Court. They also sued 16 directors of the trusts — but not Ryan Caldwell, the portfolio manager they accuse of spending the money for his own intended benefit.

    Ivy Investment and Waddell & Reed are both Delaware business trusts based in Overland Park, Kan. Kapor, Peter Brockett and Hieu Phan filed the lawsuit as a shareholder derivative complaint.

    Beginning in April 2013, the plaintiffs say, the trustees let Ryan Caldwell, one of the two portfolio managers of Ivy Asset Strategy Fund and the Waddell & Reed Asset Strategy Fund, spend approximately $925 million on "a start-up and potentially criminal" professional boxing promotion company.

    "These purchases had no economic justification, but rather were motivated by Caldwell's personal interest and benefit," the complaint states.

    The plaintiffs claim Caldwell knew the companies faced hundreds of millions in short-term losses, but pledged financial support from the funds to entrepreneur Alan Haymon, who is not a party to the case.

    "This private stock investment violated the stated terms of the Prospectuses for the Funds, which describe an investment strategy that 'primarily focuses on securities issued by large capitalization companies,' that 'can offer a high probability of return or, alternatively, can provide a high degree of relative safety in uncertain times, with Strong cash flow streams: and 'high sustainable cash flow,'" the complaint states. "Investing nearly a billion dollars of private securities in a start-up boxing promotion company, as high-risk a venture as one could imagine, meets none of these criteria."

    The plaintiffs say Caldwell's actions were inappropriate because as a fund manager he should have been making objective investment decisions.

    In June 2014, the plaintiffs say, Caldwell resigned from the funds to join one of Haymon's companies. They question whether he actually resigned, or was fired by the trustees for making the investments, and whether he had a quid pro quo agreement with Haymon's company.

    "In either case, the trustees have not acted properly," the complaint states.
    Haymon's activities have been the subject of several lawsuits recently, according to the complaint. The Courthouse News database shows Haymon as a defendant in four lawsuits since 2013, all involving pro boxing, and another lawsuit in 2005, also involving boxing.

    An independent association of State Boxing Commissioners asked the Justice Department to investigate Haymon's business practices, the plaintiffs say.
    They say the defendants kept them in the dark.

    "The Funds made no meaningful disclosure about their investment in this company, or how this investment was different from, or carried risks that were different from, the disclosed strategies in the Prospectuses," the complaint states. "The Funds also did not disclose Caldwell's personal relationship with Haymon or how that relationship influenced the decision to invest in Haymon's company — or how such a relationship might present a conflict of interest."

    The plaintiffs say that whether the defendants knew that Caldwell was investing nearly a billion dollars "into a high-risk start-up that was designed to violate antitrust laws" or not, they should have known the investment was well outside the bounds of the funds' investment strategy.

    Roger Hoadley, a vice president and director of communications for Ivy Investment and Waddell & Reed Financial said in an email that the underlying facts of the new lawsuit are similar to two others that were dismissed last year. He said that while the claims are different, they all relate to a single investment in the company's Asset Strategy Funds that represents less than 1 percent of its holdings.

    "The suit includes significant factual errors and language that brings question to its overall merit," Hoadley said in the statement. "Lawsuits such as this often arise when the value of a fund has declined. We are continuing to evaluate the pleadings and case strategy and will respond appropriately. Regardless, our commitment to managing fund investors' money and striving to deliver strong results remains unchanged."

    Caldwell started a new mutual fund company called Chiron Investment Management, which is a partnership with three former bankers from Goldman Sachs, according to a July 2015 article by The Wall Street Journal. Under Caldwell's watch, The Ivy Asset Strategy Fund delivered average returns of 10 percent over the past decade — third-best among comparable managers, according to the Journal.

    Waddell & Reed announced recently that it would lay off 10 percent of its full-time employees, as its first quarter profits this year fell by 44 percent, the Kansas City Star reported.

    The plaintiffs seek $925 million in restitution to the funds. They are represented by John Jackson Miller with Swanson Midgley, in Kansas City, Mo. Haymon was named as a defendant in two antitrust complaints in Los Angeles Federal Court in 2015; a 2014 contract complaint in Miami-Dade County; a 2013 summons and complaint in Essex County Superior Court, Newark; and a 2005 contract complaint in Clark County, Las Vegas.
    Saket Kapor, from the fact that he has literally no online presence (even the local one-lawyer law practice, if legit, has a bare-bones site to direct people too), is an ambulance chaser in the worse way.

    Beyond that, Waddell &Reed manage at least $40b, largely through mutual funds in a market where broad sectors are getting hit hard.

    Try going beyond the headline when you try and make a statement.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Eff Pandas View Post
      You're going way further down the rabbit hole than was my intention with this whole discussion lol. There is no doubt HBO boxing has needed to change as they gotten less money over the years, but I don't think they've done an awful job with what they have. I certainly don't think their investment in boxing has been a bad or improper investment. They've had less money in the last few years then they've probably ever had & they've parlayed that into the P4P top ten basically. HBO does an amazing job at picking talent, promoting that talent & controlling the narrative of their fighters for maximum effect.
      I've got a habit of doing that, tbf.

      Still, tbh, the whole p4p top 10 on HBO point, to me, is a fleeting one; Kovalev-Ward is booked for November, Ward owes HBO no fights beyond that and could walk, and a lot of step-up fights are already in the cue.

      Thurman-Porter for June, LSC-Frampton for July, Wilder-Povetkin in May, Fury-Klitschko II in July, among other fights (with prospects like Errol Spence Jr on the cusp of getting fights that'll get them to the fringes).

      Come the close of 2016, that list is going to look markedly different imo.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by PKing View Post
        Isn't it hilarious that so many media clowns were speculating that PBC spent over $400 million in less than a year based on a stupid Reddit post.

        Now this new lawsuit against W&R states that PBC was backed with not $500 million but $925 million!

        The writing is on the wall, PBC is just getting started.

        HBO Boxing is fading and will fade at an alarming pace with so many sub-par PPV events and mismatches.
        PBS is destinied to die because of Haymon's attitude to boxing. PBC mainly consist of average-leveled black fighters, who fight once a year and have no ambitions besides "give me right money". These guys fight boring fights once a year and have no sports ego. So there is nothing in PBC to excite a boxing viewer for a long time.
        And look at HBO. Thay have Kovalev, Ward, Lomachenko, Crawford - these are very skilled guys with SPORTS ambitions (not only financial). These guys want fight often and with good opposition.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Eff Pandas View Post
          I can understand this, but I think the bigger picture is it shows how far boxing has fallen too that HBO isn't throwing the money it used to into boxing. I mean the hard truth all these guys dogging or praising these various groups like HBO, PBC, GBP, Showtime & TR are ignoring is its not like anyone is exactly killing it in the boxing business these days. Sure there are certain events that are big & show what boxing is capable of still, but these events are becoming fewer & further apart. Its not a HBO problem, its not a PBC problem or anyone elses problem, its a boxing problem.
          Yes I agree, the ammount of talent in boxing is decreasing. And that's the reason of falling of boxing.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Scipio2009 View Post
            I've got a habit of doing that, tbf.

            Still, tbh, the whole p4p top 10 on HBO point, to me, is a fleeting one; Kovalev-Ward is booked for November, Ward owes HBO no fights beyond that and could walk, and a lot of step-up fights are already in the cue.

            Thurman-Porter for June, LSC-Frampton for July, Wilder-Povetkin in May, Fury-Klitschko II in July, among other fights (with prospects like Errol Spence Jr on the cusp of getting fights that'll get them to the fringes).

            Come the close of 2016, that list is going to look markedly different imo.
            Everything is fleeting. But I trust HBO to make the better plays then anyone else in the boxing business today until its proven that they can't or they get outta the business.

            Comment


            • PBC taking over yo

              you cant stop dis yo

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Shpacman View Post
                PBS is destinied to die because of Haymon's attitude to boxing. PBC mainly consist of average-leveled black fighters, who fight once a year and have no ambitions besides "give me right money". These guys fight boring fights once a year and have no sports ego. So there is nothing in PBC to excite a boxing viewer for a long time.
                And look at HBO. Thay have Kovalev, Ward, Lomachenko, Crawford - these are very skilled guys with SPORTS ambitions (not only financial). These guys want fight often and with good opposition.
                You mention fighters who fight once a year and "give me right money", then applaud HBO for having Ward LOL

                Comment

                Working...
                X
                TOP