Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Why MMA is starting to regularly do better PPVs than Boxing

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    People need to get that it's so much easier when one promotional company nearly monopolizes a sport in the US.

    If guys in boxing never got used to making the ridiculous sized purses they make, and either TR or GBP owned the vast majority of talent, that would be possible in boxing also. But it's simply not feasible because boxing has sooo many promoters, networks to deal with, and fighters that are used to getting 10+ million for one fight, not to mention 4 different sanctioning bodies. Dana White doesn't have to deal with that.

    Think of UFC like the WWE. One champion in each division, a whole **** ton of talent that he controls and who have signed contracts with him. It's just totally different.

    Comment


    • #12
      The thing with UFC is that they have a very small number of fighters compared to Boxing, and therefore their names are more "household", which makes even a weak card seem like a list of great matchups. Whereas boxing has thousands of fighters that even die hard boxing fans couldn't keep track of. The actual quality of the undercard fights between UFC and boxing are pretty equal, but in the UFC, everybody has somebody to root for because everybody knows who everybody is. The undercards in the UFC are not very exciting all the time either.

      Comment


      • #13
        never heard of any of those guys besides silva.

        also, they will have the same problems boxing has already gone through. I hear MMA fans complaining that there are too many PPV's.

        BTW, this belongs in the MMA forum.

        Comment


        • #14
          Originally posted by Patheticfraud? View Post
          The reason MMA is getting so many Pay per views is because the gay community generally has money to spend.
          Don't get me wrong, I'm a boxing fan first and a well honestly a Fedor fan and a Anderson Silva fan everyone else in MMA I have no interest in.

          But UFC is putting their cards and PPVs on the way Boxing should and IF boxing did do that It wouldn't be a stretch to say it may become a mainstream sport again.

          Comment


          • #15
            I've posted about this before and this **** has been been beaten to death.

            A main org would not be able to keep the fighters under contract like the UFC does and that main org would eventually break up to what boxing is now, it's going to happen to the ufc sooner or later and they will end up just like boxing.

            People are getting caught up into thinking the UFC is the way to go, I already posted earlier what the boxing PPV cards would look like if they were on a monthly basis like the UFC and didn't have SHO or HBO backing them up.

            January

            Trinidad vs Jones -PPV
            Mollo vs Golota-PPV
            Karmazin vs Bunema-PPV
            Chambers vs Povetkin -HBO
            Malignaggi vs Ngoudjo -SHO

            Feburary

            Pavlik vs Taylor -PPV
            Montiel vs Castillo-PPV
            Klitschko vs Ibragimov-HBO
            Williams vs Quintana-HBO
            Berto vs Trabant-HBO
            Angulo vs Cortes-SHO
            Guerrero vs Litzau-SHO

            March
            Peter vs Maskaev-HBO
            Campbell vs Diaz-HBO
            Marquez vs Pacquiao-PPV
            Casamayor vs Katsidis-HBO
            Vazquez vs Marquez 3-SHO

            April

            Dawson vs Johnson-SHO
            Tarver vs Woods-SHO
            Cotto vs Gomez-HBO
            Cintron vs Margarito-HBO
            Calzaghe vs Hopkins-HBO

            May

            Delahoya vs Forbes-HBO
            Gamboa vs Jimenez-HBO
            Angulo vs Gutierrez-HBO
            Diaz vs Pacquiao-PPV
            Dirrell vs Hanshaw-SHO
            Witter vs Bradley-SHO

            June

            Forrest vs Mora-SHO
            Quintana vs WIlliams-SHO
            Ward vs Ravelo-SHO
            Abraham vs Miranda-SHO
            Lorenzo vs Marquez-SHO
            Pavlik vs Locket-HBO
            De leon vs Lopez-HBO
            Berto vs Rodriguez-HBO
            Arreola vs Witherspoon-HBO

            July

            Klitschko vs Thompson-HBO
            Cotto vs Margarito-PPV
            Torres vs Holt-SHO
            Alvarado vs Bazan-PPV

            August

            Judah vs Clottey-HBO
            Kirilov vs Darchinyan-SHO
            Dirrell vs Pashall-SHO
            Wolak vs Smith-SHO
            Teron vs Lozada-SHO

            September

            Bradley vs Cherry-SHO
            Diaz vs Katsidis-HBO
            Juarez vs Barrios-HBO
            Mosley vs Mayorga-HBO
            Berto vs Forbes-HBO

            October

            Gamboa vs Ramirez-HBO
            Angulo vs Tsurkan-HBO
            Martinez vs Bunema-HBO
            Pavlik vs Hopkins-HBO
            Tarver vs Dawson-SHO
            Peter vs Klitschko-SHO
            Bute vs Andrade-SHO


            November

            Moliter vs Caballero-SHO
            Mijares vs Darchinyan-SHO
            Dirrell vs Oganov-SHO
            Calzaghe vs Jones-PPV
            Taylor vs Lacy-HBO
            Malignaggi vs Hatton-HBO
            Vera vs Kirkland-HBO
            Williams vs Phillips-HBO
            Arreola vs Walker-HBO

            December

            Delahoya vs Pacquiao-PPV
            Klitschko vs Rahman-HBO
            Holt vs Hopkins-SHO
            Ortiz vs Resto-PPV
            Lopez vs Medina-PPV

            The best in boxing will fight the best, it just takes HBO and SHO to put preasure on them and tell them they won't put the fighters on their network for big money unless the fights are quality.

            Comment


            • #16
              Who cares about PPV numbers? It doesn't make either sport better. Cotto vs Clottey got 0 ppv buys. Margarito vs Mosley got 0 ppv buys. Berto vs Collazo got 0 ppv buys.

              Mayweather vs De La Hoya got 2.4 million ppv buys yet it was a meaningless, and boring fight.

              Comment


              • #17
                For a sport that started in 1989, you cannot tell me that it isn't catching up to boxing. It took boxing 100 years to get like it is now, it took MMA roughly 19 years to get to where it is now. Which is right on the heels of boxing.

                Perro even had a theory to why Mayweather-Marquez was postponed. Which makes complete sense. If people forked all their cash over on UFC 100, what would Marquez-Mayweather's buys be? Exactly.

                MMA isn't doing better than Boxing in 1 PPV event BUT when you have consistently good PPV buys, its all gonna add up sooner or later.

                Comment


                • #18
                  Fcuk this bull****!!! fcuk off with this crap to an mma site!!!

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Originally posted by BROOKLYN CESAR View Post
                    Fcuk this bull****!!! fcuk off with this crap to an mma site!!!
                    LOL. U Mad?

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Bloody hell, all I was doing was using the UFC's promotion and cards as an example of how Boxing could take their PPVs and fights to the mainstream and much bigger steadier PPV numbers.

                      For example Marquez-Vazquez DESERVED to get much more viewers than it did putting a stacked card on a fight like that would guarantee some new Boxing fans.


                      Some of you are too sensative, acting as if I attacked Boxing or something.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP