Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

A New Ranking System for Boxers

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Originally posted by LaidOut View Post
    You took out the only important aspect in rating a boxer: namely, their skill set. And no two promoters or belt organizations will agree on this formula. Bottom line: you're applying objective criteria to a subjective topic, so this won't work out well.
    A boxers skill set? You are living in the past. Such things aren't relevant any more. What's a boxers skill set got to do with how many endorsements a boxer has?

    Comment


    • #12


      Outstanding

      Comment


      • #13
        Beautiful rating system. Who needs Ws Ls and KOs when we have PPV, purses, and live gates? Lol

        My only thought is that since there are 3 "+1"s in the numerator, it should be +3 in the denominator to even out the ratio. Other than that its perfect and should be implemented immediately.

        A SIDE BABY!!!

        Comment


        • #14
          Originally posted by Eubankjr View Post
          What do PPV sales, social media followers and purses have to do with how good a boxer is ?

          May as well add in how many grills they've sold.
          lol..............

          Comment


          • #15
            I say **** the fighting in the ring altogether. Just put the negotiations on PPV

            Comment


            • #16
              green K sent... this is how boxers have been rated for years... lol

              Comment

              Working...
              X
              TOP