Tweet
Is acquiring a cheap victory in boxing more commendable than losing with honor?
-
12Yes25.00%3No75.00%9The poll is expired.
-
It seems so and I'm not talking about last night. But I remember after the canelo Lara fight people were crying robbery. I'm not sure why people would even want Lara to win, what he did was disgraceful. I realize canelo is one dimensional but Lara was literally moving as fast as possible laterally and engaging for 20 seconds the whole round. -
Depends on what you're talking about, each case is different. In gerneal though, winning is always better than losing.Is acquiring a cheap victory in boxing more commendable than losing with honor?Comment
-
Winning is not everything it is the only thing~Comment
-
I would prefer a cheap victory, but I don't respect it as much; it basically depends on your opinion.
I completely respect Losing With Honor.Comment
-
Wth this new TBE community.. A win is a win to them. Doesnt matter how its acquired. I guess thats their thing.Originally posted by El-blanco View Post
Doesnt matter if you cheat, use politics, take everything away from your opponent that gives him a chance....Comment
-
This statement seems hypocritical coming from a Maidana fan! That ****er tried everything under the sun including biting and still couldn't beat an over the hill Mayweather. In the fight game losing is never better than wining.Wth this new TBE community.. A win is a win to them. Doesnt matter how its acquired. I guess thats their thing.
Doesnt matter if you cheat, use politics, take everything away from your opponent that gives him a chance....Comment
-
His name aint Floyd "Honor" Mayweather. U JUSS GOT ETHERED PLAYA. thug life.Comment
-
I don't dig the moral victory thing so a cheap victory would be my choice. Idk why people are calling last night's fight a cheap victory for. Maidana had a horrible gamelan. Just atrocious. A victory like the one Floyd had over Ortiz is more so fit for the cheap victory columnComment
Comment