Unless he retires after, his next opponent is guaranteed to be Bradley
What's funny about this is that, the reason they chose Marquez is becuz "There was no point in rematching Bradley, it was a one-sided fight"
And of course those statement were defended as the better move by people on here
So next time around, when Pacquiao does fight Bradley, they're gonna promote it as "Revenge" (or some generic synonym of that word)
After the whole "There's no point in the Bradley fight" thing, which basically means they don't care about that belt (I forget which one) or even Pac's legacy (having Bradley as a name over his losses is kind of embarrassing... Especially since you're the one that exposed him) how can they really justify Pacquiao-Bradley 2: "REVENGE"... But they'll find a way
Just an observation, bearing in mind of course I could be wrong with my prediction he could end up fighting Cotto again or something instead...
What would u guys think of that if it did happen??
What's funny about this is that, the reason they chose Marquez is becuz "There was no point in rematching Bradley, it was a one-sided fight"
And of course those statement were defended as the better move by people on here
So next time around, when Pacquiao does fight Bradley, they're gonna promote it as "Revenge" (or some generic synonym of that word)
After the whole "There's no point in the Bradley fight" thing, which basically means they don't care about that belt (I forget which one) or even Pac's legacy (having Bradley as a name over his losses is kind of embarrassing... Especially since you're the one that exposed him) how can they really justify Pacquiao-Bradley 2: "REVENGE"... But they'll find a way
Just an observation, bearing in mind of course I could be wrong with my prediction he could end up fighting Cotto again or something instead...
What would u guys think of that if it did happen??
Comment