Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Sarah Palin "we've got to stand with our North Korean allies."

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Originally posted by INJECT View Post
    Are you a nuclear scientist schooled in nuclear technology? The answer is no.

    The guardian seems to think its a pretty big issue....



    The U.S also sold Pakistan Nuclear configured f-16's, while at the same time claiming they didn't want the Pakistani's to configure them for nuclear use.

    Uh oh.... spagettioh...



    http://www.historycommons.org/timeli...r_network_tmln
    LMFAO

    the reason the guardian thinks it's a big deal is not because light water reactors can create weapons.

    they're showing rumsfeld as a hypocrite.

    when the clintons were offering that deal to the north koreans , his company was involved in supplying those light water reactors.

    when the bush administration took over and decided to take a tougher line against the north koreans , rumsfeld was against supplying light water reactors.

    you need to read the articles that you post , buddy.

    Comment


    • #22
      Originally posted by INJECT View Post
      Cosign this... She is SUPER HOT.
      :wank:

      Comment


      • #23
        Originally posted by INJECT View Post
        North Korea is the political wild card. Some people think they're controlled by China, but there is strong evidence that points to them being the U.S's puppet state in times of need.

        I need to dig around a bit before committing to either theory.
        Post a youtube video. Guaranteed one will exist.

        Comment


        • #24
          Originally posted by INJECT View Post
          Donald Rumsfeld sold them hardcore weaponry while helping propagate the "axis of evil" myth. You can't ignore this contradiction unless you're a faggot Canadian from England.



          I know too much for my own good.

          http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2003...ear.northkorea
          If your theories are so watertight why do you need to continually lie to promote them?

          Comment


          • #25
            squealpiggy is done.

            Comment


            • #26
              Originally posted by INSECT View Post
              squealpiggy is done.
              You keep saying things like that. Does it help you reassure yourself that you're not in fact mentally ill?

              Comment


              • #27
                Originally posted by squealpiggy View Post
                If your theories are so watertight why do you need to continually lie to promote them?
                ....and like a true Faggot Canadian from England you ignored the contradiction.

                Thanks for providing the laughter.

                Comment


                • #28
                  How could you mixed that up dude hahaha

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    I wonder which lips of hers was talking when it came out...In any case filth usually comes out of both lips......

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      lol. they're padding this tomato can's record to look formidable enough for soetoro in 2012.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP