The 26 happiest, richest, healthiest, and most crime-free countries in the world

[Amazinger]

So socialism is the way go then ? Marx was right.

Marx is wronger than wrong...

[Amazinger]

Socialism doesn't work, though. This list is just **** marryin', tree huggin, baby killin', dolphin savin', satan worshippin' liberal PC bull****.

Much better than gun packin,right demanding, false prophet loving, animal torturing, women stoning closet gay and bearded, skirt wearing ******s!

[Weltschmerz]

Well there you have it... Western Europe baby.

[Amazinger]

Well there you have it... Western Europe baby.

Not for long baby.... here they come!

[////]

racist list

what these countries need is more diversity to "liven things up"

[////]

Socialism doesn't work, though. This list is just **** marryin', tree huggin, baby killin', dolphin savin', satan worshippin' liberal PC bull****.

- None of those countries are "socialist"

- Some of them are academically slightly microscopically closer to "socialism" than the US, but that's because they are far smaller and more ****geneous and small ****geneous communities are naturally "socialistic". When their populations are thrown into turmoil the way the US population was, they will move away from socialism or fail (they will not attempt another massive violently coerced socialism like the USSR did, it's just not going to happen).

There is a direct correlation between cultural uniformity and the efficiency of collectivism (or lack thereof and the efficiency of laissez-faire), but these differences will be very slight in the age of economic determinism.

About the most 'Merica thing you can do is call Europe early 1900s adjectives like "socialist" and the US "capitalist" when it takes a forensic attorney to even explain the remaining differences between first world governments.

[Box-Office]

- None of those countries are "socialist"

- Some of them are academically slightly microscopically closer to "socialism" than the US, but that's because they are far smaller and more ****geneous and small ****geneous communities are naturally "socialistic". When their populations are thrown into turmoil the way the US population was, they will move away from socialism or fail (they will not attempt another massive violently coerced socialism like the USSR did, it's just not going to happen).

There is a direct correlation between cultural uniformity and the efficiency of collectivism (or lack thereof and the efficiency of laissez-faire), but these differences will be very slight in the age of economic determinism.

About the most 'Merica thing you can do is call Europe early 1900s adjectives like "socialist" and the US "capitalist" when it takes a forensic attorney to even explain the remaining differences between first world governments.

Yeah, I don't have a source but one of my Pol Sci (not my major) profs was saying how ethnically ****genous countries have no issue with a welfare state because the services being paid for by their taxes is going to their brothers and sisters in blood and the more diverse it gets the more you don't want it. Pretty much what you're saying.


Also people want to equate anything collectivist with Marx's socialism, where as it is only natural for small countries/communities to...........you get the point.

[Amazinger]

- None of those countries are "socialist"

- Some of them are academically slightly microscopically closer to "socialism" than the US, but that's because they are far smaller and more ****geneous and small ****geneous communities are naturally "socialistic". When their populations are thrown into turmoil the way the US population was, they will move away from socialism or fail (they will not attempt another massive violently coerced socialism like the USSR did, it's just not going to happen).

There is a direct correlation between cultural uniformity and the efficiency of collectivism (or lack thereof and the efficiency of laissez-faire), but these differences will be very slight in the age of economic determinism.

About the most 'Merica thing you can do is call Europe early 1900s adjectives like "socialist" and the US "capitalist" when it takes a forensic attorney to even explain the remaining differences between first world governments.

How do you define the efficiency or inefficiency of Laissez-faire?.

[samouraļ]

"But America is different doe, doze policies can't work here."

[John Barron]

the muslim invasion of Europe is going to make this list irrelevant real quick.