Let me clear things up with people who lack some boxing knowledge. First of all, I believe that Marquez won the fight. And now I'm gnna tell you the reason why he won. First of all, Marquez's style is perfect for pacquiao. Pacquiao is an aggressor and he comes in or leaps forward. While Pac does that, Marquez(a counterpuncher), counters and attacks pacquiao. An important thing to mention is that Marquez fought pacquiao twice in the past already, so its obvious he studied and knows how pacquiao moves and also has his timing down for him. Not only that, but marquez is willing to brawl with pacquiao and he might be able to get the advantage in those brawls by being the counter puncher. This leads on to Pac being tentative with his punches, making him throw less. In the fight, Marquez won a lot of the exchanges.
Now people are saying that Mayweather will go through pacquiao after watching the fight. Well, they could be wrong because Marquez and Mayweather, although they are both counterpunchers, have different styles when you think about it. Since they have different styles, you cant judge the may-pac fight based on the marquez-pac fight.
For example,
Mayweather fought hatton and KOed him in the later rounds. Pacquiao beat hatton in 2 rounds. Does that make Pac better than May?
NO it doesn't. Its the same concept with the marquez fight. Mayweather might have had an easier time with marquez than pacquiao did, but from that fact alone, you can't say May will beat pacquiao forsure.
Also, marquez counters pacquiao with a combination and mayweather is more like a guy that would counter with one good punch and use footwork. When marquez gets swarmed on by pac, he decides to fight back. Now the question is, when pac corners Mayweather and swarms on him, will Floyd fight back with a combination, or will he just cover up just like how he did with victor ortiz?
Again, I'm saying that you cant judge the May-Pac fight based on the Marquez-Pac fight and thats all im saying.
IF YOU SAID THAT MAYWEATHER WOULD BEAT PAC because of the past events not including the pac-marquez 3 fight, then i dont see a problem with that, but if you're saying May would beat Pac just purely based on the Marquez-pac 3 fight, then youre just underestimating how effective styles really are in boxing.
Thank you, and feel free to criticize me.
Now people are saying that Mayweather will go through pacquiao after watching the fight. Well, they could be wrong because Marquez and Mayweather, although they are both counterpunchers, have different styles when you think about it. Since they have different styles, you cant judge the may-pac fight based on the marquez-pac fight.
For example,
Mayweather fought hatton and KOed him in the later rounds. Pacquiao beat hatton in 2 rounds. Does that make Pac better than May?
NO it doesn't. Its the same concept with the marquez fight. Mayweather might have had an easier time with marquez than pacquiao did, but from that fact alone, you can't say May will beat pacquiao forsure.
Also, marquez counters pacquiao with a combination and mayweather is more like a guy that would counter with one good punch and use footwork. When marquez gets swarmed on by pac, he decides to fight back. Now the question is, when pac corners Mayweather and swarms on him, will Floyd fight back with a combination, or will he just cover up just like how he did with victor ortiz?
Again, I'm saying that you cant judge the May-Pac fight based on the Marquez-Pac fight and thats all im saying.
IF YOU SAID THAT MAYWEATHER WOULD BEAT PAC because of the past events not including the pac-marquez 3 fight, then i dont see a problem with that, but if you're saying May would beat Pac just purely based on the Marquez-pac 3 fight, then youre just underestimating how effective styles really are in boxing.
Thank you, and feel free to criticize me.
Comment