Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Federer or Sampras?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    There's nothing Pete has on Federer... Maybe a better second serve. That's about it.

    Federer won 13 gram slams in 5 years... that's right 5 years.

    Last edited by deliveryman; 01-07-2013, 11:09 PM.

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by Rapid Counter View Post
      50/50 in my opinion
      that's how i feel.

      Fed never faced prime Pete.

      Fed is the Greatest and I enjoy his game more than Pete but in his prime Pete was a beast.

      A ****ing beast.

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by DTMB View Post
        that's how i feel.

        Fed never faced prime Pete.

        Fed is the Greatest and I enjoy his game more than Pete but in his prime Pete was a beast.

        A ****ing beast.

        A green Federer was the one who snapped Pete's streak at Wimbledon (19yrs vs 29yrs old). Sampras went on to win 2 more grand slams afterwards.
        Last edited by deliveryman; 01-07-2013, 11:47 PM.

        Comment


        • #34
          Best ever. No one can touch him but a robot in 30 years

          Comment


          • #35
            Tough one but Federer by a slight margin...
            Federer defeated Sampras when he was past it but Federer past prime > Sampras past prime..

            Comment


            • #36
              This is a bit like comparing Johannes Vermeer and Rembrandt. Sure, Vermeer was good at what he did, but Rembrandt is the GOAT.

              Comment


              • #37
                Federer is the GOAT. And he didn't need a coke edge to get there...

                Comment


                • #38
                  Tim Henman for me.

                  Nothing beats the glory days of Henmania.

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X
                  TOP