P4P... it's made up, you know.

It's a bunch of boxing journalists sitting around arguing who, hypothetically, would win in a fight. Usually between people of widely different weight divisions, so the chances of genuinely finding out the results of a "P4P" argument are few and far between. As an example, we have no idea who, P4P, would win in a fight between Andre Ward and Chad Dawson.

I appreciate this kind of stuff is OBVIOUS, but sometimes the obvious needs pointing out to you **** hawks.

[Roy Jones Jnr]

The only P4P worth bothering about is the P4P DISH off......

The only P4P worth bothering about is the P4P DISH off......

AMEN!

But say to most of these **** hawks that Felix Sturm is P4P top five and they'd never get it.

[BafanaBafana]

It's a bunch of boxing journalists sitting around arguing who, hypothetically, would win in a fight. Usually between people of widely different weight divisions, so the chances of genuinely finding out the results of a "P4P" argument are few and far between. As an example, we have no idea who, P4P, would win in a fight between Andre Ward and Chad Dawson.

I appreciate this kind of stuff is OBVIOUS, but sometimes the obvious needs pointing out to you **** hawks.

P4P lists are very subjective and shouldn't be taken too seriously. The whole purpose of the P4P rankings is really to market/promote popular fighters (see: RING/GBP P4P rankings).

[techliam]

It just for money. Label someone as p4p and you can milk them for more cash

In reality, it means nothing. You can label someone the best fighter in the world, which is kinda what P4P is meant to be, but when you get to lists of like 5 or 10, it gets ridiculous. Everyone has their favourite fighter, that's all you need.