Actually its a good question. I think they are pretty close, resume wise and skills wise. Each does some things better than the other.
Thinking about it though hopkins may be slightly better. JMM has good offense and combinations but Hopkins did in his prime as well and basically up until his late 30s which is where JMM is now and then he started dropping his output and throwing more than one shot at a time. So some of the negatives about hopkins dont apply until he is in his 40s and older than JMM is now so I dont think its fair to knock him for that.
Hopkins was on the top at 160 for a decade and that is worth something too.
Thinking about it though hopkins may be slightly better. JMM has good offense and combinations but Hopkins did in his prime as well and basically up until his late 30s which is where JMM is now and then he started dropping his output and throwing more than one shot at a time. So some of the negatives about hopkins dont apply until he is in his 40s and older than JMM is now so I dont think its fair to knock him for that.
Hopkins was on the top at 160 for a decade and that is worth something too.
Comment