Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Should judges be allowed to score rounds even?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Should judges be allowed to score rounds even?

    What if there is no clear winner in a round. Why do you have to declare one? Why can't you just 10-10 it or even 9-9.


    Thoughts?

  • #2
    Originally posted by DonMega View Post
    What if there is no clear winner in a round. Why do you have to declare one? Why can't you just 10-10 it or even 9-9.


    Thoughts?
    Wouldn't this more than likely result in more draws?

    Comment


    • #3
      yea if there is very little activity

      Comment


      • #4
        no. i think we should just have 13 rounds.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by SlySlickSmooth View Post
          no. i think we should just have 13 rounds.
          good idea.....
          Last edited by jas; 12-16-2014, 06:30 PM.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by DonMega View Post
            What if there is no clear winner in a round. Why do you have to declare one? Why can't you just 10-10 it or even 9-9.


            Thoughts?
            I agree with you in principle, but in practice people don't like seeing even rounds scored and it makes judging the end result of a fight more confusing. If a fight is 116-112 then at a glance you know that the winner won 8 rounds to the loser's 4. If the fight is say 116-114 then some of the clarity in the final score is lost.

            I think the only time a 10-10 score is warranted is if absolutely nothing happened in a round. If there's action then there should be enough to score for one guy or the other, but if nothing happens then nobody really deserves the round.

            Comment


            • #7
              It's more of an American thing to never score even rounds isn't it? The argument being that a competent judge should always be able to find a winner over three minutes of action.

              I think drawn rounds are appropriate. There should be some distinction between toss-up rounds and rounds where there's a clear winner. Some judges will use them as a cop-out, but it's not like judges don't cop-out of tough calls anyway.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Dr Rumack View Post
                It's more of an American thing to never score even rounds isn't it? The argument being that a competent judge should always be able to find a winner over three minutes of action.

                I think drawn rounds are appropriate. There should be some distinction between toss-up rounds and rounds where there's a clear winner. Some judges will use them as a cop-out, but it's not like judges don't cop-out of tough calls anyway.
                Maybe it is an American thing, because I hate even rounds. Like, really hate them.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Even rounds have no place in professional boxing.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Even rounds are for indecisive puzzies.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP