A few years later Holyfield beat Moorer in a rematch and it became full circle but until 1994 it was a good example of the triangle theory.
I don't think this is a good example because Moorer was beating Foreman the whole fight until those 2 punches landed.
Triangle theories are more based on somebody beating somebody on points or being ahead on the scorecards when a knockout happens.
Bird beat Vitali
Vitali beat Sanders
Sanders beat Wlad
Wlad beats Bird
well, when I read that "Byrd beat Vitali" I think about the fight and to me it was not like that. Vitali quit because of an injury but he was beating Byrd, it wasn't like Byrd was winning the fight really.
I don't think this is a good example because Moorer was beating Foreman the whole fight until those 2 punches landed.
Triangle theories are more based on somebody beating somebody on points or being ahead on the scorecards when a knockout happens.
That's how you see it but I count the win as long as it was not a robbery or a lousy disqualification. I understand your statement but the official result, in this case, seems valid to me and I give credit to Foreman for a legitimate win even if I had only given him one round prior to the 10th.
well, when I read that "Byrd beat Vitali" I think about the fight and to me it was not like that. Vitali quit because of an injury but he was beating Byrd, it wasn't like Byrd was winning the fight really.
Cotto vs Mosley was razor close, wasn't it?
Margarito beat Cotto? Well, Cotto won the rematch, furthermore there is suspicion about the first fight.
What's the difference between my example and yours. Mosley vs. Dela Hoya was close and Mosley admitted to being on PED's in the 2nd fight which puts his whole career under suspicion. Similar don't you think?
What's the difference between my example and yours. Mosley vs. Dela Hoya was close and Mosley admitted to being on PED's in the 2nd fight which puts his whole career under suspicion. Similar don't you think?
Comment